Research On Local Government Public Service Contract Outsourcing

In the US market reform of public services,in recent years,the government has essentially outsourced the functions of the government to private entities.After Obama took office,he urged the federal government to establish a “government's inherent function” policy and establish which functions the government can outsource.Which functions are suitable for the legal basis of the government's own performance,to a certain extent,solidify the boundaries of the government's public service contract outsourcing.In the context of global market-oriented reforms,the supply of public services has been refocused on the government."Inherent government functions" use public interest as the core judgment basis,and use the "cost-benefit" condition as a reason for judging.The intrinsic functions of the federal government are listed in a list format.While publicizing government functions to the society,it also solidifies the government's The core status defines the boundaries of which type of subject the contract outsourcing is suitable for.Since the outsourcing of public service contracts was introduced into China,ithas been recognized and promoted by governments at all levels.It has effectively responded to the requirements of changing government functions while improving the quality of government public supplies.However,contractual outsourcing has gradually exposed some problems in practice.The government has gradually relaxed its control in the process of contract outsourcing,and even lost core status in some outsourcing that involves the government's key functions.The government should be responsible for the “elemental governance” of public services.Character.The author believes that the government has increasingly lost its core functions in the reform of public service marketization.First,in terms of private entities participating in the process of outsourcing public service contracts,China has no specific contractual procedures for private entities to perform public services,making public services Outsourcing loses the operational functions such as necessary decision-making,supervision,and control of the government;second,the public service is lost in the process of contract outsourcing;the social cost is aggravated;and the public law is lacking,resulting in the loss of the government's social management function;and thirdly,the public sector and the private sector.The departments share public power through contract outsourcing,from power control to power sharing,which reflects the loss of government administrative functions.Therefore,government contract outsourcing essentially has the risk of outsourcing government core functions.China's government administrative system reform has undergone seven changes since 1982,including 1982,1988,1993,1998,2003,2008,and 2013.The transformation of the government's functions is the core of the reform of the administrative system.With regard to the transformation of functions,the government has continued to simplify its administration and decentralize power.It has been divided into three changes,presenting the gradual transfer of microeconomic management functions,public services,and social management functions,as well as the clear definition of power and solidification of power under the power list system.Based on this,reflecting on the US government's "government's inherent functions" policy logic,combined with China's actual reforms,we come to the stage of marketization of public service reforms in the same country,and it is the governmentof the two countries to draw a clear relationship between the government and the market.Common voice.Based on the similarity of this political background,although the "inherent functions of the government" cannot be fully replicated,they have the spirit that can be used for reference.This applies to China that has gradually taken the road to market-oriented economic restructuring.The U.S.government's efforts to frame the government's functions beyond the scope of unreasonable outsourcing has become a model for China's confrontation with public and private boundaries.China's theoretical logic that draws on the "government's inherent functions" is feasible.According to whether or not government functions are closer to the criteria of political appeal,the functional structure of "core-periphery" is defined to determine the core functions and peripheral functions of various government departments.It can serve as the basis for the outsourcing of government functions in the outsourcing of public service contracts.In order to make contract outsourcing more effective in the provision of public services,it is necessary to rethink these issues and find out the root cause of the reform of new public management.This article attempts to make efforts in this regard.According to the field of government functions,from the political,economic and social aspects of the government's core functions,the government should strengthen its core position,these functions should be performed by the government in person,can not be outsourced to private groups.At the same time,the author believes that from the outsourcing of public service contracts,the government should follow the order of function outsourcing from the periphery to the core,match different public service content according to different characteristics of government and market,and strengthen the government's supervision responsibility in contract outsourcing.The three dimensions ensure that the outsourcing of contract control is outside the scope of unfavorable marketization and optimize the service provision process.Third,by strengthening the government's awareness of the main body,sense of rationality,and awareness of the rule of law in the process of functional outsourcing,we should ideologically clarify the significance of the government in the “quasi-market”becoming a reasonable supplier of supply,and maintain a good public service market order.