| way of movement,have the function of the adjust fitness,as the recovery after training method,realize the recovery after training,is one of the recent athletes recover the contents of the thesis.According to the tae kwon do movement characteristics,combining with the recovery of athletes after training needs and yoga in helping the recovery after training,the significance of the study of yoga as a means of recovery of taekwondo athletes body function and physical quality index of the subject,the influence of experimental method as the main research methods,clear yoga help taekwondo athletes training and physical quality indexes of physical functioning after the specific impact,with abundant recovery after training theory research,and guide the practice of taekwondo athletes training after recovery,reflect the research theory and the practice value.Research methods: to study the second-tier players 20 members in taekwondo team in shaanxi province as the research object,balance factors such as gender and height and weight,players can be divided into the experimental group and control group,each group of 10 people,carry out eight weeks to yoga restorative training as a means of taekwondo athletes training again after the effect of the test.Research results:1.The morning pulse test results showed that the experimental group was 0.97 times higher than the control group in the first week,and there was no significant difference between the two groups(p = 0.05).In the second week,the heart rate of the experimental group decreased by 0.54 times/min,and the heart rate of the control group increased by 1.91 times/min.The experimental group was 0.4 times lower than the control group,and there was no significant difference(p = 0.05).In the third week,the experimental group increased 1.51 times/min,the heart rate of the control group increased 0.73 times/min,and the experimental group was 0.38 times/min higher than the control group,with no significant difference(p = 0.05).In the fourth week,the experimental group increased 1.29 times/min,and the control group increased 2.18times/min.The experimental group was 0.51 times lower than the control group,and there was no significant difference(p = 0.05).In the fifth week,the experimental group increased 0.06 times/min,and the control group increased 0.13 times/min,and the experimental group was 0.7 times lower than the control group,with no Research purposes: after intensive training,athletes should also join the specialrehabilitation training,to speed up the recovery process,improve the recovery efficiency,and help to adapt to the training content and strength athletes.Yoga as agroup decreased 1.09 times/min.The experimental group was 0.06 times/min higher than the control group,and there was no significant difference(p = 0.05).In the eighth week,the experimental group decreased 0.88 times/min,and the control group decreased 0.22 times/min,and the experimental group was 0.6 times lower than the control group,with no significant difference(p = 0.05).2.The pre-training heart rate showed that the experimental group was 0.91 times higher than the control group in the first week,and there was no significant difference between the two groups(p = 0.05).In the second week,the heart rate of the experimental group increased 0.39 times/min,and the heart rate of the control group increased 0.91 times/min.The experimental group was 0.39 times/min higher than the control group,and there was no significant difference(p = 0.05).In the third week,the experimental group increased 1.09 times/min,and the heart rate of the control group increased by 1.08 times/min,and the experimental group was 0.55 times lower than the control group,with no significant difference(p = 0.05).In the fourth week,the experimental group increased 0.87 times/min,and the control group increased0.14 times/min.The experimental group was 0.18 times/min higher than the control group,and there was no significant difference(p = 0.05).In the fifth week,the experimental group increased 0.1 times/min,and the control group increased 0.86times/min,and the experimental group was 0.58 times lower than the control group,with no significant difference(p = 0.05).In the sixth week,the experimental group decreased 0.71 times/min,and the control group decreased 0.76 times/min.There was no significant difference between the experimental group and the control group 0.53times/min(p = 0.05).In the seventh week,the experimental group decreased 0.12times/min,and the control group decreased 0.2 times/min,and the experimental group was 0.45 times lower than the control group,with no significant difference(p = 0.05).In the eighth week,the experimental group decreased 0.44 times/min,and the control group decreased 0.02 times/min.The experimental group was 0.91 times lower than the control group,and there was no significant difference(p = 0.05).3.The immediate heart rate after intensive training showed that the experimental group in the first week was 0.57 times higher than the control group,and there was no significant difference between the two groups(p = 0.05).In the second week,the significant difference(p = 0.05).In the sixth week,the experimental group decreased1.63 times/min,and the control group decreased 1.72 times/min.The experimental group showed no significant difference(p = 0.05)compared with the control group.In the seventh week,the experimental group decreased 0.42 times/min,and the controlcontrol group increased 0.99 times/min.The experimental group was 0.43 times higher than the control group,with no significant difference(p = 0.05).In the fourth week,the experimental group increased 1.27 times/min,and the control group increased 0.7 times/min,and the experimental group was 1 times/min higher than the control group,with no significant difference(p = 0.05).In the fifth week,the experimental group increased 0.12 times/min,and the control group increased 0.12times/min,and the experimental group was 1 times/min higher than the control group,with no significant difference(p = 0.05).In the sixth week,the experimental group decreased 1.73 times/min,and the control group decreased 1.01 times/min,and the experimental group was 0.28 times/min higher than the control group,with no significant difference(p = 0.05).In the seventh week,the experimental group decreased 1.05 times/min,and the control group decreased 1.62 times/min.The experimental group was 0.85 times higher than the control group,with no significant difference(p = 0.05).In the eighth week,the experimental group decreased 1.12times/min,and the control group decreased 0.35 times/min.The experimental group was 0.08 times/min higher than the control group,and there was no significant difference(p = 0.05).4.The heart rate of 2 minutes after exercise showed that the experimental group was 0.82 times higher than the control group in the first week,and there was no significant difference between the two groups(p = 0.05).In the second week,the heart rate of the experimental group increased by 0.44 times/min,and the heart rate of the control group increased by 1.1 times/min.The experimental group was 0.16times/min higher than the control group,and there was no significant difference(p =0.05).In the third week,the experimental group increased 1.27 times/min,the heart rate of the control group increased 0.82 times/min,and the experimental group was0.61 times/min higher than the control group,with no significant difference(p = 0.05).In the fourth week,the experimental group increased 0.84 times/min,and the control group rose 1.9 times/min,and the experimental group was 0.45 times lower than the control group,with no significant difference(p = 0.05).In the fifth week,the experimental group increased 0.14 times/min,and the control group increased 0.29times/min.The experimental group was 0.6 times/min lower than the control group,heart rate of the experimental group increased 0.68 times/min,and the heart rate of thecontrol group increased 0.33 times/min.The experimental group was 0.22 times/min lower than the control group,and there was no significant difference(p = 0.05).In the third week,the experimental group increased 1.64 times/min,and the heart rate of thedecreased 1.18 times/min,and the control group decreased 1.94 times/min.The experimental group was 0.22 times lower than the control group,and there was no significant difference(p = 0.05).In the eighth week,the experimental group decreased 2.03 times/min,and the control group decreased 1.3 times/min.The experimental group was 0.95 times lower than the control group,with no significant difference(p = 0.05).5.The results showed that the experimental group was 0.39 times higher than the control group in the first week,and there was no significant difference between the two groups(p = 0.05).In the second week,the heart rate of the experimental group increased by 0.14 times/min,and the heart rate of the control group increased 0.39times/min.The experimental group was 0.14 times/min higher than the control group,and there was no significant difference(p = 0.05).In the third week,the experimental group increased 0.43 times/min,and the heart rate of the control group increased 0.8times/min,and the experimental group was 0.23 times lower than the control group,with no significant difference(p = 0.05).In the fourth week,the experimental group increased 0.75 times/min,and the control group increased 0.63 times/min,and the experimental group was 0.11 times/min lower than the control group,with no significant difference(p = 0.05).In the fifth week,the experimental group was maintained at 89.42 times/min,and the control group increased 0.12 times/min,and the experimental group was 0.23 times lower than the control group,with no significant difference(p = 0.05).In the sixth week,the experimental group decreased0.52 times/min,and the control group decreased 0.53 times/min.The experimental group was 0.32 times/min lower than the control group,and there was no significant difference(p = 0.05).In the seventh week,the experimental group decreased 0.29times/min,and the control group decreased 0.39 times/min.The experimental group was 0.12 times/min lower than the control group,and there was no significant difference(p = 0.05).In the eighth week,the experimental group decreased 0.71times/min,and the control group decreased 0.49 times/min.The experimental group was 0.34 times lower than the control group,and there was no significant difference(p = 0.05).6.The subjective feeling of physical,according to the results of the first week of and there was no significant difference(p = 0.05).In the sixth week,the experimentalgroup decreased by 1.32 times/min,and the control group decreased 0.94 times/min.The experimental group was 0.98 times/min lower than the control group,and there was no significant difference(p = 0.05).In the seventh week,the experimental groupwas raised 0.25 points.The experimental group was less than 0.25 of the control group,and the difference was not significant(p was 0.05).In the third week,the scores of the experimental group and the control group remained unchanged.In the fourth week,the score of the experimental group was unchanged,and the control group was raised 0.25 points,and the experimental group was less than 0.5 in the control group,and the difference was not significant(p was 0.05).In the fifth week,the experimental group was raised 0.25 points,and the control group remained the same.The experimental group was less than 0.25 of the control group,and the difference was not significant(p was 0.05).In the sixth week,the scores of the experimental group and the control group remained unchanged.In the seventh week,the score of the experimental group decreased by 0.25,and the control group decreased by 0.25.The experimental group was less than 0.25 of the control group,and the difference was not significant(p was 0.05).In the eighth week,the experimental group decreased by 0.25,the score of the control group did not change,and the experimental group was less than 0.5 in the control group,and the difference was not significant(p was 0.05).7.Test results of hemoglobin.Before the trial test indicators,the experimental group hemoglobin level mean value of 142.11 g/L,the control group hemoglobin level mean value of 141.01 g/L,hemoglobin content between the two groups differ0.1 g/L,no significant difference(p st13 0.05).After the experiment test,the experimental group the hemoglobin levels at an average of 142.97 g/L,increased 0.87g/L,the control group was 141.18 g/L,increased 0.17 g/L,the experimental group of hemoglobin values rise more than the control group.The difference between the two groups was 0.79 g/L higher than the control group,and the difference was not significant(p = 0.05).8.Test results of blood urea nitrogen.Before the trial test indicators,the experimental group,blood urea nitrogen level of average tendency for 6.24 L,the control group,blood urea nitrogen level of average tendency for 6.35 L,the control group,blood urea nitrogen level slightly higher than that of the experimental group tendency for 0.11 / L,no significant difference(p st13 0.05).After the experiment test,the experimental group the levels of blood urea nitrogen average tendency for 6.21 / L,yoga rehabilitation training after the intervention,the subjective feeling of physicalscore of experimental group in 8.75 1.45 mm,the control group in 9 + /-1.50,0.25 points lower than the control group,while no significant difference(p st13 0.05).In the second week,the experimental group was raised 0.25 points,and the control groupdifference(p = 0.05).9.Test results of serum creatine kinase.In the first week of the experiment,the mean value of creatine kinase in the experimental group was 103.04U/L,and the mean value of the control group was 100.21U/L,and the experimental group was slightly higher than the control group 3.17 U/L,with no significant difference(p =0.05).8 weeks,the experimental group of creatine kinase dropped to 99.30 U/L,relative fell by 3.74 U/L level before the experiment,the control group was 98.31 U/L,relative fell by 1.9 U/L before experiment,comparison between experimental group and the control way,the experimental group was slightly higher than the control group0.99 U/L,no significant difference(p st13 0.05).The creatine kinase value decreased more in the experimental group.10.Test results of the forward bending of the seat body.The first week of the experiment,the experimental group ZuoWeiTi proneness of test results is 18.45 cm,the control group ZuoWeiTi proneness of test results is 18.64 cm,and the use of traditional means is 0.19 cm from the control group,no significant differences between the two groups(p st13 0.05).In the eighth week of test,the experimental group reached 25.10 cm before the seat body,increasing by 8.65 cm.Control group ZuoWeiTi proneness measurements are slow growth,to 20.15 cm,compared to before the start of the experiment,the growth of 1.51 cm,the experimental group than the control group increased 4.95 cm,in the two groups before ZuoWeiTi flexor flexibility test,showed significant difference(p ? 0.05).Conclusion:1.The restorative yoga training compared with massage muscle recover on its own way,to taekwondo athletes before the morning pulse,heart rate,rate of sports center,2 minutes after exercise heart rate,heart rate and recovery after recovering methods plays a positive role of subjective feeling of physical,have positive effects on the recovery of athletes body function state.2.Compared with the recovery method of self-massage muscle,yoga restorative training has a positive effect on the recovery of hemoglobin,blood urea nitrogen and serum creatine kinase in the blood of taekwondo athletes.3.Compared with self-massage muscle recovery,yoga restorative training can reduces the tendency for 0.03 / L,the control group was 6.51 tendency for L,increased tendency for 0.16 / L,the experimental group showed reduced,blood urea nitrogen values increased slightly while the control group.The experimental group in the two groups was 0.3mmol/L lower than the control group,with no significant15 effectively improve the flexibility of taekwondo athletes. |
PDF Full Text Request