A Comparison On The Standard For The History Curriculum From The 2003 Edition To The 2017 Edition

In 2017,the Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China formulated and promulgated the Standard for the History Curriculum of General High Schools,which is a programmatic document that guides the teaching and learning of history courses,under the new historical background,combined with more than a decade of experience in curriculum reform and foreign experience.The new curriculum reflects the new changes and new requirements.On the basis of Previous studies,the author studies the changes of the General High School History Curriculum Standard(Experiment)and the General High School Curriculum Standard(2017 Edition).Carding out every part of the subject.This paper analyzes the new ideas which embodied in the Standard of History Curriculum of General High School(2017 Edition),and hopes that it can provide reference for the teaching work of the front-line teachers.The text is divided into five parts.The first part is the contrastive study of preface.This part breaks the chapter restriction,and carries on the contrast from the revision background,the course nature,and the basic idea,and carries on the elaboration to the latter two.The 2017 edition introduces a definition of "history" in terms of the nature of the curriculum,emphasizing the link between history course and history,and the fundamental role of history in the development of students 'personality.In terms of basic concepts,the two editions emphasize the educational function of the curriculum,and the 2017 edition focuses more on learning important historical events and figures,and emphasizes the interface of knowledge in middle school and high school.The second part is a comparative study of curriculum objectives.This part of 2017 curriculum standards change greatly,the first proposed the subject core literacy,improved the differentiation between history course and other courses,capacity requirements are more detailed.The third part is the comparative study of curriculum structure.The objectives of the course are described in terms of course structure and credits.In terms of structure,only required courses and elective courses are included in the 2003 edition and 2017 edition included required courses,required-elective courses and elective courses.In the credit aspect,the required course must study,and the credit is larger,required-elective courses are 2 credits each,the elective course does not have the credit,and only can guarantee to master the general history,has stimulated the student study interest.The fourth part is the comparative study of curriculum content.According to the order of time and space,this paper makes a comparative study of Chinese history and world history,and compares and analyzes the changes of the two editions of the subject.The new curriculum standards pay more attention to the study of general history,and improve the academic ability in this foundation.The fifth part is the comparative study of the suggestions.The suggestions in 2017 edition are careful but not harsh,more opening and guiding.In addition,the study of academic quality in the 2017 edition included in the academic level examination and proposition proposal,and more specifically compares the characteristics of the two editions of the curriculum in the examination,and focusing on cultivating the core accomplishment of the subject and divides students with different ability levels,which are both comprehensive and adaptable.