A Comparative Study Between The 2007 Edition And 2003 Edition Of Physics Curriculum Standards For Senior High School

The curriculum standard is the programmatic document formulated by the nation in the course of curriculum reform.It is the basis of curriculum implementation,textbook compilation,teaching evaluation and examination proposition.This study takes "Physics Curriculum Standards for Senior High School(experimental version)"(hereinafter referred to as the 2003 edition standard)and "Physics Curriculum Standards for Senior High School 2017"(hereinafter referred to as the 2017 edition standard)as the research object,by using text analysis,chart analysis,comparative research,econometric analysis and other methods to compare and analyze the framework,course nature,concept,objectives,structure,content and implementation suggestions of the two editions of the curriculum standards,to deepen the understanding of physics teachers of the 2017 edition standards,and better cultivate student's core competence in the teaching process,to implement the fundamental task of "strengthen moral education and cultivate people".This paper consists of eight parts.The first part is the introduction,which introduces the background and significance of studying different editions of curriculum standards.At the same time,it summarizes the existing research results at home and abroad.After introducing the main research contents,it briefly discusses the main research methods;the second part is the comparative analysis of the text capacity and basic framework of the two editions of curriculum standards;the third part is the comparative analysis of the nature and basic concepts of the two editions of curriculum standards;the fourth part is the comparative analysis of the core literacy and curriculum objectives of the two editions of curriculum standards;the fifth is the comparative analysis of the curriculum structure of the two editions of the curriculum standards;the sixth part is the comparative analysis of the curriculum content of the two editions of curriculum standards in both macro and micro aspects;the seventh part is the comparative analysis of the implementation recommendations of the two editions of curriculum standards;the eighth part is the research conclusion,teaching suggestions and the shortcomings and prospects of this study.Through the analysis,it is found that the differences between the 2017 edition and the 2003 edition of the curriculum standards are mainly manifested in the following points:?large text capacity,clearer requirements for each part of the content,better overall framework of the curriculum;?more specific summary of the nature of the discipline,clear education positioning;?core literacy is the inheritance and deepening of the three-dimensional objectives,which is a high degree of integration of the three-dimensional objectives,and the core literacy can better demonstrate the educational function;?straighten out the relationship between compulsory courses and elective courses,so as to further optimize the curriculum system;?keep the integrity of the original curriculum system,which is more substantial and more contemporary than the 2003 edition of curriculum standards;the two editions of curriculum standards have great differences in curriculum breadth and curriculum depth,and the depth of the course is slightly different;?implementation recommendations around the development of students' core literacy,proposed teaching,evaluation,textbook compilation,local schools and other suggestions of the recommendations,the content is more specific,and the quality of the academic level.