Study On The Changes And Causes Of The Contracted Land Use Of Farmers In Poverty-stricken Counties In Mountainous Areas Based On The Promoting Labor Migration

The gradual migration of rural population to cities is an inevitable result of China’s sustainable socio-economic development.Working outside is not only an individual behavior of farmers in compliance with this historical trend,but also a key measure for many poor counties to win the battle against poverty.The Xundian Hui and Yi Autonomous County,a national poverty county,has a wide range of poverty and a deep poverty level.The county has carried out special measures to increase the income of migrant workers.From 2014 to 2018,a total of 125,611 rural laborers have been employed,which has helped a large number of farmers get out of poverty.However,this poverty alleviation model causes a large number of rural labor transfers in the short term also has an impact on the use of contracted land by farmers,mainly in the areas of land abandonment,decline in land use efficiency,and decline in land productivity,which are not conducive to the sustainable use and protection of land resources.In this regard,on the basis of condensing the results of existing research literature and the field survey and interviews with county and township cadres,village cadres,and farmers,and related information on the model of increasing incomes and reducing poverty among workers,I sorts out rural land policies,conducts field surveys,analyzes and draws out the impact of the model of increasing incomes and reducing poverty on farmers ’contracted land is mainly caused by changes in the input of land production factors,changes in farmers’ subjective will,and the poverty alleviation policy system that cannot allow farmers to withdraw from the organic combination of contracted land and industrial development and so on.In addition,the questionnaire survey of the poverty alleviation households who established a file to establish a file shows that the area of land use and land productivity of migrant workers are on a downward trend compared with those before and without migrant workers.Land transfer is to solve this problem and consolidate a viable means of “win-win” results of poverty alleviation and sustainable use of land resources.Further investigation shows that in terms of the factors that affect the use of contracted land by farmers,on the whole,farmers’ subjective will has a greater weight on the use of contracted land by farmers,but there is no significant difference in the impact on different types of farmers,which is a common effect.The poverty alleviation policy system has the largest impact weight,while the production factor impact weight is smaller,but the changes in production factors are strongly related to the land use efficiency classification.Both the poverty reduction policy system and the poverty reduction policy system are the main factors that cause different types of farmers to use land.In concrete terms,the correlation coefficients between different factors and land use efficiency reflect the contribution of various indicators to the differences in land use change among different types of farmers.First,the three most relevant factors are changes in capital investment,satisfaction with farming training and satisfaction with industrial policies.These three factors can be divided into two categories.Changes in capital investment reflect the theoretical basis of land intensive and economies of scale,Satisfaction of farming training and satisfaction of industrial policies reflect farmers ’pursuit of their own utility;Second,the R value of capital investment changes is relatively close to 1,indicating that the economies of scale and intensive economy of the land have not reached the optimal scale before the input changes Intervals and intensive intervals further illustrate that land use is at least under-invested by the sample farmers in this article.Third,the R value of farming training and industrial policy is relatively close to 1,which reflects the importance of farmers ’satisfaction,and satisfaction represents the increase of farmers’ utility.Satisfaction expresses the subjective feelings of peasant households.For agricultural industry policies,it also includes the objective indicators of farmer training and industrial policy investment.The correlation of subjective indicators is stronger than the objective indicators,indicating that the policy’s foothold should be more inclined to peasant household satisfaction Rather than the specific value of objective input.Fourth,the factors with strong correlation are all related to the withdrawal of farming,that is,the contracted land management,except for the number of farming training persons analyzed above.Fifth,the factors with strong correlation mainly focus on the changes in the input of production factors.Compared with changes in capital investment,changes in the duration of farming,changes in economic crop technology,changes in unit seed inputs and changes in the use of large-scale agricultural machinery mainly reflect changes in physical inputs.The R value of capital inputs is more correlated than physical changes,indicating that savings are used for land use.The importance of investment.Savings form funds,part of which comes from the inflow of the industrial and commercial sectors(the migrant workers return the funds to the farmers who work at home),and part comes from the surplus of agriculture.From this,it can be seen that the promotion of rural financial development The use is more promoting;sixth,the school attendance rate of children ’s work sites is also a strong influencing factor,indicating that farmers ’emphasis on education should be strengthened and the education of migrant workers should be strengthened so that farmers can withdraw from contracted land operations without worries.Helping the smooth progress of land circulation;seventh,the income level before working is inversely related to the level of farmer contracted land use.The higher the income before working,the higher the land use efficiency before working and the less likely it is to maintain the original level of use.On the contrary,it is easy to return to the original level of utilization by increasing the input.Therefore,this indicator further illustrates the importance of the input.Although different indicators reflect different aspects,in general,it can be seen that they are essentially inputs.The concrete manifestation of the utility of the peasant households is represented by the scale economy and intensive economy of land.From the analysis of the factors,the policy making direction and the mode selection of rural land transfer and development and utilization can be derived.It is suggested that strategic attention should be given to the issue of rural land contracted management left behind by outdoor migrant workers under the background of increasing incomes and poverty alleviation.In specific measures,it is necessary to establish a compensation mechanism for the withdrawal of agricultural land use,and to establish and improve the method for the allocation of agricultural use.In other words,it is suggested that land transfer be used to expand agricultural production and promote intensive land use,so as to consolidate the effectiveness of targeted poverty alleviation and development,and better use and protect land resources in order to achieve the good interaction effect of the rational use of land and targeted poverty alleviation.Aiming at the poverty-stricken counties in mountainous areas,the family contracting system for land should be continued on the premise of fully realizing the improvement of land use efficiency.On this basis,the industrial poverty alleviation model and the poverty alleviation model for increasing labor income are integrated from a macro perspective,so that their effective interaction becomes a whole,and the value of land resources is better utilized.In terms of promotion,due to the small and scattered land contracted by farmers usually,land conservation and intensive use should be the mainstay,with land scale economy as the auxiliary.At the same time,we must pay attention to the citizenization of migrant workers so that they have no worries and provide side support for improving the rural land transfer market.For the county,the opportunity of favorable policies for pig farming can be seized to vigorously improve the efficiency of land resource utilization and further consolidate the results of poverty alleviation.