On Marx’s View On Nature At His Period Of New Materialism

At present, scholars have ten viewpoints on Marx’s View on Nature at his period of new materialism in China while foreign scholars in this area about seven views so far. In general, they think on the basis of the framework of the "dialectical materialism", or out of the "traditional" field start in logic, leaving a number of issues, but also quite good results obtained . Which also asked "dialectical materialism" and "Western Marxism" Thoughts on Marx’s View on Nature at his period of new materialism become a title about understanding on Marx’s View on Nature at his period of new materialism .Engels, Lenin and Mao Zedong as representatives of classical Marxism understood Marx’s View on Nature at his period of the new materialism within the framework of the" dialectical materialism". They thought all of the whole objective world as the different manifestations of motion of matter in the light of matter being motion, so Marx’s View on Nature at his period of the new materialism differed from Views on Nature of both "all previous materialism" and the idealism. It was materialist, and dialectical View on Nature. Therefore, in this logic, Marx’s View on Nature at his period of new materialism was deprived of its unique practical characteristic, to some extent pushed back to the old materialist position.The "Western Marxism " thought were out of the traditional framework of the "dialectical materialism" and made humanistic or scientific understanding on Marx’s View on Nature at his period of new materialism. Although they had reversed the "traditional" understanding of the rigid closure tendency ,to a large extent, and revealed the practical feature of Marx’s View on Nature at his period of new materialism, their understanding as the "dialectical materialism" did, were not consistent with Marx’s explains on the nature on the basis of practice being material and, therefore, did not reveal the true meaning of Marx’s View on Nature at his period of new materialism. However, many scholars because they were separated the dialectical relationships between individual and general and denied nonhuman nature and, therefore, did not reveal well the true meaning of Marx’s View on Nature at his period of new materialism.the interaction between human history to the world history and globalization of capital, beginning with the world’s great geographical discovery, constitutes the realistic background of Marx’s View on Nature at his period of new materialism, and Feuerbach’s materialism is its theoretical background. In the "Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844", Marx had proposed View on Human Nature, but at that time because he was still being affected by Feuerbach his explaining on human nature still left a tail of Feuerbach’s humanistic philosophy. Therefore it was not conscious, not thorough. To 1845, Marx launched a revolution in philosophy, so he leaped from the principle to material practice, from serving humanity to serving the proletariat in his starting point. then he completely abandoned "once all materialisms "and idealisms, and leaped to the New Materialism, which opened a conscious perspective of View on Nature that was part of the New Materialism.Stage the New Materialism, Marx believed that human nature was one that people created in their practice. This means that human nature was’s one of the elements of practice, not out the practice of human activities, and it is the people’s practical activities. And the truth of this view of Marx can work in people’s production and scientific experiments.Thus, global ecological crisis that mankind is facing is man’s own crisis in essence. Its emergence is associated with both the thinking of guidance for practical activities, and natural and social relations in human nature. Therefore, to overcome the current ecological crisis, we must first correct, comprehensive and profound understand practical laws to enhance predictability; followed by the elimination of alienation, to eliminate opposition of interests among individual collective and society, correctly handle the relationship among their interests; again quickly develop the productive forces and create more productive than the present. Marx’s exposition about human nature shows also that it is a leap From Feuerbach’s Natural Materialism to Marx’s Historical Materialism. In terms of views on nature it embodies in three aspects: first, from the unidirectional dependence on nature to interaction between dependence on nature and transformation of the nature; second, from only being simple View on Nature to being integration of View on Nature and History; third , from the simple interpretation of the nature and pursuit of the service for humanity to changing the world and serving for the proletariat.In Marx’s View on Nature at his period of new materialism, the general, and individual were a dialectical unity. Thus, Marx did not recognize that we could create a "there" from the "no". This indicates that although the elucidations of the human nature are the essence of Marx’s New Materialist View on Nature, marking Marx’s New Materialism View on Nature coming to the world, them aren’t its all contents. In Marx’s New Materialism View on Nature, not only this revolutionary contents that elaborate human nature, there are contents that set forth basis of human nature --nonhuman nature. Also, nonhuman nature not only exists, but is dialectical.