The Research Of The Inter-Subjectivity Of Network Education Of Ideology And Politics

The development of network technology changes our ways of living. We are not just living in the physical world of reality, but also in a world of network information, which is the technological cyber space of human intelligence. In this networking world, we are carrying out ideological and political education by our networking manner. The relationship between the educator and the educated is a subject-to-subject other than a subject-to-object manner. Nevertheless, in reality, the relationship between them is a much simpler, stereotyped one. This rigid connection in the networking world has already been destroyed by the nature of networking interaction. In the networking world, the relation between the educator and the educated should rather be a kind of inter-subjectivity than a single, stereotyped feature. In order to grasp the nature of ideological and political education by networking, its positive effects and development tendency, the dissertation, which is titled as the Research of the Inter-subjectivity of Network Education of Ideology and Politics, focuses upon the inter-subjectivity of network education of ideology and politics. The dissertation includes the following six parts.The first part, namely the first chapter, is the introductory part of the dissertation. In the introduction, the author gives a brief survey of the reason, the current situation and oncoming prospects, the framework, the innovative highlights of the study of inter-subjectivity of network education of ideology and politics and its significance, etc.The second part, namely the second chapter, discusses the theoretical basis of the study. In the chapter, the author probes into the theoretical sources about the inter-subjectivity of net-work education of ideology and politics, which regards that both the educator and the educated are human beings in nature. After that, the author discusses the theoretical origins of the inter-subjectivity in education of ideology and politics in both Western and Eastern world so as to borrow and help to make the study theoretically profound and thorough.In the third part, namely the chapter three, analyzes the nature of network education of ideology and politics. In the chapter, the writer researches into the prescriptive nature of the inter-subjectivity of network education of ideology and politics, namely, the fundamental essence and character of network education. After that, the writer needs further to analyze into the structural features of this kind education, which is characteristic of being dynamic nature in perspective of static observation.The fourth part, namely the fourth chapter, studies the generating process of inter-subjectivity in the network education of ideology and politics. In the chapter, the author mainly discusses the generating mechanism, power, state and law, etc. of the inter-subjectivity in network education of ideology and politics. The generating mechanism forms the basis of the inter-subjectivity in network education of ideology and politics. The generating power is the source of development for the inter-subjectivity in network education of ideology and politics. The generating state is the outer demonstrations of the inter-subjectivity in network education of ideology and politics. The generating law shows the innate inevitability of the inter-subjectivity in network education of ideology and politics.The fifth part contains two chapters, namely the chapter five and six. The fifth chapter is about the effects of the network inter-subjectivity upon the network education of ideology and politics, which mainly probes into the great effects of the innate law of inter-subjectivity in the networking education. Based upon the previous discussion, the chapter six further investigates into the development tendency of the network education of ideology and politics in light of its inter-subjectivity.The sixth part contains the concluding remarks. In this final section, the writer summarizes the merits and the demerits of the theoretical analysis of the dissertation.