Study On The Efficiency Of China’s Rural Poverty Alleviation Funds

Poverty,population problems, together with pollution problems constitute the three major problems of human society, it is also a global social phenomenon, which is the comprehensive results of political, economic, social and cultural development imbalances as well as differences in natural conditions, geographical, ecological, and human individual differences. Rural poverty problem has plagued our country’s overall development, the Chinese government has unswervingly adhere to poverty alleviation and development work for a long time and made remarkable achievements, but the rural anti-poverty task is still very difficult, with the social environment changes, rural poverty work faces with many new situations and new problems, which needs to find a theoretical basis and empirical evidence to focus discussion and analysis on the following problems:What is the new features of current Rural poverty? what is the main factors causing? Why China’s rural poverty alleviation funds are increasing significantly, while the efficiency is slowing down? How to improve the investment mechanism and what is the best anti-poverty way in rural areas?The article makes empirical and theoretical analysis based on592key counties which is collected from "China Rural Poverty Monitoring Report" as well as the author’s surveys collected data from2006to2011sample from20key counties in Hunan Province, the study finds:(1) the current rural poverty showed the following characteristics:①the number of poor people is declining, but the scale is still large;②poverty is shrinking, and increasingly concentrated with impoverished population distribution;③the ability of anti-risk for poverty population is weak, and they are easily back into poverty;④he internal rural income gap is widening, and the relative poverty has become increasingly prominent.(2)the main factors causing rural poverty are as follows:affected by geographic location and natural conditions; by agricultural capital, labor, land and water resources and other factors of production constraints; by farmers’ acquirements for knowledge, information and self-development capacity constraints; by urban "dual" system, rural land property rights system as well as cultural system in rural areas, rural education system, political rights and the legal system, the rural social security system impairment in rats.(3)the relationship between different sources of anti-poverty funds to invest in with the output elasticity is relatively low, which is far from the formation scale.(4) the efficiency of different orientation sources of poverty funds on the output elasticity of poverty alleviation is low, which is far from the desired effect.(5) the relationship between sources of different orientation and the internal structure of earnings growth factors on the poor farmers with the contribution rate of the output elasticity is significantly different and inconsistencies.Article concludes with a dynamic targeting as a starting point, to strengthen the body’s own construction, which chooses scientific selection mode as a means of poverty alleviation, making exact rural poverty alleviation rationalize funding mechanisms, focusing on rural poverty alleviation funds to strengthen the performance appraisal and supervision to protect the "Five in One" to enhance the efficiency of China’s rural poverty alleviation funds...