| Sociological and economical shifts have transformed the face of the modern organization. Historically, employment has been divided among racial, gender and generational lines. Classism has traditionally been linked to racism more than any other factor. In today's society, individuals and organizations that pride themselves on being anti-racist, still may not be anti-classist.; Diversity within organizations is now seen as a key factor in assisting with innovation, creativity and success. In an age where most people now consider themselves to be middle class, regardless of financial status, what dynamics, if any, still make up class distinctions? This study attempts to approach the sensitive topic of classism and find out how successful an organization has been in separating racism from classism.; To investigate this question, a review was made of the literature regarding racism, classism, and the effects of diversity in today's organizations. The literature review discusses the historical underpinnings of class differences on America's east coast. Previous research on efforts made by one non-profit organization faced with this issue was also included. The review also included how the organizational literature uses language such as in-group and out-group to explain inequalities and dynamics that divide different groups of people within organizations.; Research was conducted at the Unitarian Universalist Association, in Boston, Massachusetts, a non-profit organization that is known for supporting principles of equality and diversity. Surveys were conducted on fifty-seven employees, along with follow-up interviews on fourteen employees. Questions pertained to subjects' perspectives on what, if any, characteristics or cues made for differences or dynamics of class within the organization.; Results found that, although there is still some link between race and class in the work force, morality, education and religion made more of a difference to the subjects being surveyed. In-group and out-group dynamics consisted of whether or not an employee had the status of being exempt or non-exempt, and also whether a person was a Unitarian Universalist or not. |
