Government Responsibility In The Public Crisis Management Research

China entered the twentieth century in the nineties the same time, China also Jinru high public crisis period,both are in politics,Ling Yu,Jing Ji areas,or in other social fields, Chinese society has undergone Duoci public crisis;On the one hand, with the accelerating pace of economic globalization, economic,political,cultural and natural factors as incentives to frequent outbreaks of public crisis, such as the 1997 outbreak of Asian financial crisis broke out in 1998 flood disaster, the outbreak in spring 2003 The SARS incident in 2004,the global outbreak of bird flu, in November 2005 in JiLin explosion......have led to a tremendous impact on the public crisis. This ongoing needs of public crisis and theoretical researchers from the perspective of real answers;On the other hand, China current economic restructuring is still in the transition period leading to social transrormation, economic and political reform as the motive force of social reform, and its essence is the interests and fights of re-redistribution, which will intensify the conflict between related subjects. This crisis in public is a government function to reposition the Guocheng, in view of this, from the government and the should take the fundamental duty of major problems.Based on this understanding, I believe that, since the reform and opening up in China today is at a critical time and modernization, reform and opening up constantly stepped up the socialist market trend of rapid economic development and globalization, the situation is becoming increasingly clear, bound China's social stability brought many threats and long-term stability of the factors threatening China can respond effectively to the crisis not only the directly affect the public in China reform and opening up and modernization process, not only the direct impact on China social stability and long-term stability, and directly affects the hearts of the Chinese public, the Government's credibility and image, strengthen the public crisis management of government responsibility is to our governments at all levels must attach great importance to the problem can be said that under such circumstances, research of public crisis management of government responsibility, not only has a strong theoretical significance, but also has profound practical significance:Theoretical sense, the public crisis management of government responsibility is a controversial issue, papers from the public were at different stages of the crisis of the government should assume responsibility and demonstrate their specific positioning, which is clear in theory, the government responsibility, has important theoretical significance. Of public crisis of all different stages of government responsibility, not only can make us and clarify the Government's responsibility in the public crisis, and it could in theory question of how to be able to promote the Government's public crisis:From a practical sense, of public crisis management in government responsibility help to promote social justice, sustainable social development and harmonious development.In this article, I will focus on the responsibility of public crisis management in the Government's definition of public crisis management in the absence of specific performance of government responsibility, crisis management in China public reasons for the lack of government responsibility, and strengthen public crisis management in the government the responsibility for four areas of public crisis management of government responsibility were discussed:First, the public liability crisis management in government as defined in terms of:first, the crisis in public prior to the outbreak, the government should establish a public crisis management awareness, developing public crisis management plan, to increase public crisis of the early warning capacity and monitoring capabilities, centralized, unified state of crisis in the exercise of public power for emergency disposal, to develop effective programs to deal with public crises and countermeasures; Finally, in a public crisis, the relevant agencies should destruction of public crisis, the implementation of the social system 'mending', then the implementation of the social system'in the making';Second, our public crisis management lack the specific performance of government responsibility, the process of management of public crisis, the responsibility of our government are often in a deficient, or even the absence of the state, which mainly:1) Our crisis is not in place early warning, monitoring fatigue2) China crisis plan humble, and also a lack of exercise; 3) the crisis with the public release of information related to untimely, often delay the timing of dealing with public crises.Third, our public crisis management reasons for the lack of government responsibility is concerned, I will focus on four aspects of interpretation was carried out:1) weak sense of , crisis, the crisis of the early warning, response to relatively low capacity; 2) the process of governance of public crisis, the Chinese Government's lack of effective communication and coordination mechanisms; 3) The Government's crisis management lack a sound legal system of protection; 4) in the government process of public crisis, the lack of accountability efforts.Fourth, on how to strengthen public crisis management of government responsibility in the issue, I will focus on renovation of the Chinese government public crisis management hardware condition, and strengthen the organizational power of crisis management and to strengthen the system construction of three aspects of this issue was discussed..