Live Together With The Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Area Villagers Autonomous Study

Villagers ’ autonomy is the breach of the democracy construction of our country.Villagers ’ autonomy in multiethnic areas is the important guarantee of minority regionseconomic and social overall development. Studying villagers ’ autonomy of the districtnot only has strong practical significance, but also has certain theoretical value. Thispaper, based on the field research, analyses the current situation and reflects thedilemma of villagers’ autonomy in multiethnic village. The paper deeply researchesvillagers ’ autonomy in multiethnic areas from the following three parts.The first part which mainly illustrates the theoretical basis of the villagers ’autonomy in multiethnic areas divides into three conclusion in the developing concept ofnation, multiethnic areas and the political system of the regions. The political system ofmultiethnic areas is distinguished from any other single-ethnic areas. In the process ofsystem implementation, we must considerate not only the general factors, but also thevariations in political and social level, economic advancement and cultural tradition,especially preferential policies to minority.The second part summaries the current situation of villagers ’ autonomy inmultiethnic areas in Xinjiang, which expounds four aspects: democratic election,democratic decision-making, democratic management and democratic supervision. Theelection is intervened in the national element, religious factors and other elements. Manyvillagers even show political apathy, making democratic election in a mess. Because ofthe characteristics of the multi-national mixing-up, democratic decision-making exists infour difficult problems: decision-maker is not high literacy, multi-interests makedecision-making be hard to form resultant force, decision-making contents and forms arelack of innovation, and decision-making procedures are tedious and lack of two-wayinteraction mechanism. Democratic management is influenced by ethnic relations, andthe village party branch and villagers ’ committee presents the situation of unification toinfluence villager self-management really. The mechanism of democratic supervision isnot sound become a mere formality, and cannot effectively rule the power.The third part includes three opinions to aim at the situation of villagers ’ autonomyin multiethnic village: the relationship between economic development and politicaldemocracy, how to solve the problem of political apathy and the future of villagers ’autonomy in multiethnic area. This paper is deemed that economic development is thepremise of political democracy while the latter is the purpose of the former, so weshould first promote economic development level in multiethnic area, improve people ’ sincome and the happiness index. Under the adequate material wealth prerequisite, weshould carry out the political democratic construction. Villagers’ political apathy is disservice of grass-roots democracy. The effective way to break away from politicalapathy is that the manager do not exaggerate the degree of villagers political apathy, atthe same time, vigorously develops the village economy, and carries out various kindsof beneficial cultural activities to national fusion. The future of villagers ’ autonomy inmultiethnic areas shall be from three aspects: firstly village committee is a server insteadof a administrators, secondly play the rural party bridge role fully, and finally weakenvillagers narrow national consciousness, then strengthen their citizen consciousness.