Comparative Study Of High Language Textbook

To modern school teaching activities, teaching materials is the gist ofteachers’ teaching activities, is also the main basis for students engaged inlearning activities. The teaching materials is the main criteria to measurethe level of basic education of a country or region. Therefore, the qualitylevel of teaching materials must be given adequate attention. With a longhistory, to compile Chinese teaching materials, has its own traditionalfixed mode. With the implementation of the reform of basic educationcurriculum, the system of writting teaching materials has challengedseriously. In order to meet the reform of the basic education curriculum.the different versions of the teaching materials emerged in all country.The Chinese Standard teaching materials was used in four provincesof our country in2004. As the nucleus of teaching material,the textbookcan show the new theory from the curriculum reforms. Therefore，toresearch the textbook with different versions, is helpful to the Chineseteaching material construction in the future, is also helpful to using itbetter for teacher.The thesis takes the Chinese Teaching Materials for High School byPeople’s Education Press as research object, uses research techniques of literature law and comparison test,is based on the research anddevelopment overview of chinese teaching materials by People’sEducation Press, studis and contrasts the structure of two sets of teachingmaterials, the system of article selection and students assistance.I hopeit will be helpful to understanding and grasping deeply teaching materialsfor teachers on front lion，and even contribute to revising and improvingthe chinese teaching material by People’s Education Press.The full text altogether divides into following seven parts:Introduct remarks the significance of article, object of study andresearch technique.First chapter Summarize Chinese Teaching Materials by People’sEducation Press: survey the development of Chinese Teaching Materialsby People’s Education Press, introduce laterally the different versions.The second chapter the compare the structure of two sets of highschool chinese compulsory teaching materials: based on introduction ofstructure of two sets of teaching materials, contrast the structural systemof the two sets of teaching materials in detail.The third chapter the compare the chooses thearticle of two sets ofhigh school chinese compulsory teaching materials: Chooses the articlefrom the microscopic angle to tow sets of teaching materials thecapacity, to choose article the time, to choose article the literature style,and so on to conduct the comparison research separately. The fourth chapter the compare the assist students the system of twosets of high school chinese compulsory teaching materials: Includingcomparison research of the foreword, leads language, illustration,comments of the tow set of teaching materials.The fifth chapter editions of language teaching materials, evaluationand use of recommended: To summarize the advantages anddisadvantages of the two editions of textbooks, the proposed use of thetextbook recommendations.The conclusion summary of the research results of the paper andpointed out the research value.This paper argues that: two sets of the teaching materials have theirown characteristics.it is clear that the class standard version of teachingmaterials reflects the new philosophy of the curriculum reform, has agreat innovation than the past. Comparison, we see that there are stillinsufficient, such as the teaching materials structure and the assiststudents system. The author recommends that: establish the correctconcept to use teaching materials and use a variety of teaching strategiesto achieve the creative use of teaching materials.