Research On The Behavior Of Government Crisis Management In Minority Areas In China

Increasingly rapid pace of social development, but social problems, social conflicts but endless, whether or not developed countries, national security remains under threat, particularly in the public crisis everywhere. For the government, crisis management is a very important part. At present, China on crisis management just in its infancy, although there are a lot of studies and literature, however, levels of study is quite simple Therefore, China should strengthen the public awareness of crisis management Numerous national regions, the natural environment is very complex, slow economic growth, coupled with the impact of natural disasters, ethnic life and property of people in areas under serious threat, therefore becoming increasingly prominent social contradictions, various groups incidents continue appears. Ethnic crisis in the region, compared with other public crisis has its special place, so we need to further accelerate the ethnic minority areas of crisis management, to establish a sound management system, so as to enable people to stay away from crisis minority areas, living in a harmonious society, eventually building a moderately prosperous society to provide a harmonious and stable environment.This total is divided into seven chapters. The first chapter is the introduction. This paper first describes the research background, purpose and meaning, and secondly describes Home and Abroad, and finally describes the theoretical foundation and research methods. The second chapter is public crisis and government action. The first part of the definition of the concept of public crisis-related. The second part of the theory of government behavior. The third chapter is the minority status of regional government crisis management overview. Mainly analyzes the ethnic minority areas of government crisis management particularity significance hinder and obstruct the cause. The fourth chapter is mainly ethnic minority areas of government action in crisis management bias. Mainly divided into three parts:first, the crisis prevention stage deviant behavior Second, the crisis management phase of deviant behavior. Third, the crisis in the aftermath stage deviant behavior. Chapter five ethnic minority areas in crisis management reasons for the deviation of government behavior, mainly from the intrinsic motivation and extrinsic system defects are analyzed. Chapter VI primarily the United States and Japan’s public crisis management government behavior described. Chapter VII presents the final specification minority areas of government action in crisis management countermeasures.