The Research On The American Government’s Position And Variation On The Diaoyu Islands Dispute

Diaoyu Island dispute is the important part of the maritime rights and territorialsovereignty disputes, as the country which plays the important role in the NortheastAsia region, the United States has the history and reality responsibility to the DiaoyuIslands, while it influences the situation changes in international relations in theregion. The research of the paper makes the position and its changes of the UntiedStates in the Diaoyu Islands dispute as the research object, the appearance and thetrend of the position and its change of the United State in the Diaoyu Islands disputeas the research emphases, to explain, analyze and argument the impact of the UntiedStates in the Diaoyu Islands.The introduction in the paper includes the purpose about the evolution of theUnited States position in the Diaoyu Islands dispute, the research meaning, the currentresearch situation and the research methods. The introduction is the brief presentationfor the relevant conditions of the research.The first section of the paper mainly includes the history carding, the concretecontent is the actual control of the Diaoyu Islands by the United States, the Diaoyuisland issue of the return Okinawa agreement which intends to involve and theseparated state of “the sovereignty” and “the administration power”. On the base ofthe fact carding, clarify deep cognitive about the Diaoyu Islands the dispute.The Second section includes the Diaoyu Islands sovereignty ascription positionof the United States, which is the basic statement. The concrete content includes thatwhether the American government position about the Diaoyu Islands is or not suit tothe US-Japan Security Treaty, in the statement of the issue by the Americangovernment, sometimes it told that the Diaoyu Islands is suit to the US-Japan SecurityTreaty, sometimes it told not. In the last the section it explains the United States donot hold positions on the issue of sovereignty over the Diaoyu Islands.The third section tell that the reasons which the United States position in theDiaoyu Islands dispute wavering, which include mainly that the “Bilateral multiplehot spots” strategy and governance in East Asia with the United States after World War II, the “Dual containment” and the American China-Japan control strategy, the“offshore balance” and the Asia-Pacific rebalance strategy of the United States, toanalyze the policy the United States in the Diaoyu Islands diptute.The forth section is the change and the trend of the United States position in theDiaoyu Islands dispute, the content of the section includes the possibility about thetwo the balance of the China-Japan strategy and the flexibility to choice of the U.S.position, and it also includes the analysis of the trends in the U.S. Asia-Pacificstrategy mew balance and its carried recessive intervention. The research of thesection is the argumentation and analysis of the evolution trends of the United Statesposition in the Diaoyu Islands dispute.The fifth section is the strategic impact of the United States position in theDiaoyu Islands dispute, to the United States, Japan, China and the Northeast Asia. Itincludes the variables and the corresponding relations among the U.S.-Japan Alliance,the Japanese Strategy, the rise of China, the China-Japan relation, the selectiveintervention and the Asian Paradox. The section also introduces the position whichChina need take when it faces the position and impact of the United States in theDiaoyu Islands dispute, which includes the analysis of the content about the DiaoyuIslands strategic values and the strategic re-evaluation of the China-Japan dispute, theAmerican “strategic reassurance” and the Chinese “strategic re-insurance”, China-USjoint control and Chinese “creative involvement” policy and etc.The conclusion in the paper proposes the United States position in the DiaoyuIslands dispute influences the Asia-Pacific region security. Diaoyu Islands are China’sinherent territory, as the participants in the Diaoyu Islands dispute, China need payattention to the change and the impact of the United States position in the DiaoyuIslands dispute and then to response.