In The Common Course For The Sports Education Professional Football Technology Assessment Plan Experimental Study

With the growing prosperity of the social development, football received more and more attention inpublic, but the level of football in China and some European and American countries still have certain gap,the cultivation of the talent is one of the important ways to solve the problem. Football talent cultivationneeds a group of outstanding coaches and school teachers, and so pay special attention to the students incolleges and universities sports education professional football education is one of the effective methods.This article through to the Henan university sports college sports education professional technologyassessment scheme for experimental research, design a set of new evaluation methods and examinationmethods old comparison and analysis, found the problem, sum up experience, try to establish a set ofreasonable and perfect technical appraisal method, in the common course for the football will highlight theappraisal method to improve students’ ability; Promote the sports departments of football technology andteaching reform, to develop new, more adapt to the current education model, society urgently needs theexcellent sports teachers can provide some reference opinions.In this paper, using the method of literature, mathematical statistics, logic analysis and expertinterview method, experimental method, five kinds of research methods, the technical appraisal in thecommon course for the sports education professional football two testing methods to obtain various dataafter statistics processing to the following conclusion:1. After two test methods for the rod shot test results analysis, independent sample inspection doublerow of round bar shot test results with single row around the goal of the test results that there was asignificant difference between the matched sample test analysis, double row of round bar shot techniquecompared with the single round rod technology to student’s test is more comprehensive, and can betterdistinguish between the advantages and disadvantages of student performance.2. After the test results of header testing two kinds of test method for independent samples for analysis,two kinds of test methods that there was a significant difference between the test results of two methods oftest after test results are paired sample test analysis, the header test design ball jumped up and head for thein situ head combined with the test method of test for students to distinguish the grades of students has more advantage.3. After play on foot inside two testing methods and testing results of samples for analysis, two kindsof test methods there is no significant difference between the test results.4. After playing on the inside of the instep two testing methods and testing result analysis, independentsample inspection of two kinds of test method that there was a significant difference between the testresults of two methods of testing the test result matched sample analysis, method2inside of the instep playtest the goal set partition of1to2points.5. After the two methods of testing the test result to bounce the ball measured sample inspectionanalysis, two kinds of test methods there is no significant difference between test results.6. After two test methods for each grade average sample inspection analysis, two kinds of test methodsthere is no significant difference between the average.According to the data analysis combining with the characteristics of football sports, in this paper, theauthor put forward the following Suggestions:Single row dribbling round rod shooting technology test students grasp of the technology is notcomprehensive, double row of round bar with the requirements of technical test more real football, theapplication of it can be used in a double row of round bar shooting technology assessment methods to thestudent for the rod test. Using in situ overheads technical appraisal of the students are tested for technicaleasy to learn, a little practice you can master, can not achieve the purpose of the test very well, so the balljumped up and head combined with in situ head test method. After medial to the feet to play two methodsof testing results of the analysis, the two methods there is no significant difference between test results, sothe students are tested using the original test method. Through to the inside of the instep play two methodsof testing the test result analysis showed that there were significant differences between two methods oftesting the test result, test method of the new design on the goal1points,2cent the test method is moreeffective to distinguish the advantages and disadvantages of the student’s grade, so can use the new designof the test methods for measuring student. To toss the ball test two methods of testing the test result analysisthat there is no significant difference between two test results, the original test method can be used forstudents to test.To sum up of the two test methods, in combination with the advantages and disadvantages of various test comprehensive comparison, in the future sports education professional students in the common coursefor the football technical appraisal Suggestions can be used in a double row of round bar shot (method2),in situ ball head jump off and head combination (method2), playing foot inside (method1), a division ofthe inside of the instep kick (method2) and toss the ball (method a) five tests, can make a better learningsituation for students more reasonable test evaluation.