Research On The Consistency Of Academic Evaluation And Curriculum Standards

"Basic Education Curriculum Reform Program(Trial)" pointed out that the national curriculum standards are the basis for the preparation of teaching materials,teaching,assessment and examination,is the basis of national management and evaluation courses;and "Ministry of Education on the further advance and further improve the examination reform The"evaluation and examination system" which is suitable for the new curriculum is the key system for the implementation of quality education.Therefore,under the guidance of the new curriculum reform concept,as the academic examination of the main embodiment of China’s academic evaluation,Examination),you must take the curriculum standards as a guide and important basis,we can see "based on curriculum standards"teaching research is imperative.In this paper,we use the SEC consistency analysis tool and combine the curriculum standards and related policy theory to summarize the qualitative analysis angle of the auxiliary refinement of the SEC consistency analysis tools,namely,the distribution of knowledge,the depth of knowledge,scientific inquiry ability,emotional attitude values and The consistency of the chemistry evaluation and curriculum standard of junior middle school in Changchun City of Jilin Province from 2014 to 2016 was analyzed by means of quantitative analysis and qualitative analysis.1.Study conclusion(1)Three years of academic evaluation and curriculum standards of the level of consistency1)The index for 2014 is 0.585,which is lower than the significance coherence index of 0.6427,which is inconsistent with the curriculum standard;2)The index for 2015 is 0.549,which is lower than the significance coherence index of 0.6417,which is inconsistent with the curriculum standard;3)The index for 2016 is 0.573,which was lower than the significance coherence index 0.6203,which was inconsistent with the curriculum standard;And P2014>P2013>P2015,the three-year coherence index has remained at 0.549-0.585,more stable,but overall,2014,2015,2016,based on the curriculum standards of teaching and evaluation of the implementation of the situation Is not optimistic,should cause the majority of Changchun City academic evaluation of those who pay attention and reflection.(2)2014,2015,2016 Changchun City,Jilin Province,academic evaluation in the content dimension of the study are focused and "around the chemical substances" in the theme of "life in the common compound"theme of the study;(3)2014,2015,2016 Changchun City,Jilin Province,academic evaluation in the cognitive dimension of the main focus on knowledge of the "understanding" and "application" of the study,and "know" and"understanding" of the investigation are low In course standards;(4)In 2014,2015,2016,Changchun City,Jilin Province,academic evaluation in the skill level are higher than the curriculum standards,analogy migration ability to study less,scientific inquiry ability is not complete;(5)2014,2015,2016 multiple choice questions have a question related to emotional attitudes and values of the study,but some of the lack of vivid knowledge of the situation;2.Influencing factors(1)Curriculum standards1)The specific target is not clear;2)the definition of behavioral verb is not clear;3)lack of performance standards;(2)Academic evaluation factors1)The selection of the academic level examination function;2)the limits of the academic level examination questions;3)the limits of the academic level examination form;4)the limits of the academic level examination time;(3)Proposition factor1)The proposition of the proposition trends and knowledge content to grasp the degree;2)proposition of the professional quality(4)coding team quality factors3.Based on the cause analysis,the following strategies are proposed(1)Improve the curriculum standards1)Refine the specific curriculum objectives;2)clearly define the behavioral verb;3)increase the performance standards;(2)Rich academic evaluation test form1)To distinguish between academic evaluation and selection of examinations,to promote academic evaluation only to examine the academic level of students function;2)rich academic evaluation questions set,increase the open question;3)rich academic evaluation form,unit test,End of the test included in the study of academic evaluation;(3)The teacher evaluation of literacy into the teacher’s quality Cultivate the professional evaluation of the quality of each teacher and the concept of teachers to promote the standardization of daily teaching and evaluation;(4)To adjust the evaluation of different dimensions of the inspection efforts1)Content dimensions,reduce the "side of the chemical substances"subject of the study,to enhance the "chemical and social development"the subject of inspection efforts to control the "material composition of the mystery" and "material chemical changes" the subject of inspection efforts;2)Cognitive dimension,reduce the "understanding" and "application"level of content of the study,increase the "know" and "understand" the content of the content of the study;3)The ability of scientific inquiry ability,and gradually improve the study of students’ ability of scientific inquiry ability,increase the use of class analogy ability of students;4)Emotional attitudes and values of the dimension,can be set on the subject of knowledge content,increase the lively question situation,increase the student’s interest in inquiry.4.Discussion on the study There are perfect things about qualitative analysis...