The Comparative Research To Writing System Of Two Chinese Textbooks Between The MEP Edition And The PEP One

Writing and reading have always been two important components of language teaching,in which reading is the basis and writing is the purpose.There is no doubt that writing is significant in junior high school language teaching.The Chinese Teachers are mainly based on the writing system of the language teaching material to carry on the writing teaching.In the autumn of 2016,the language textbooks of grade seven which are organized and compiled by the Ministry of Education,put into use in middle school all over the country.And other teaching materials will be put into use as the semester grade advance,gradually replace the original textbooks.Compared with the textbooks of the PEP edition,the MEP edition is comprehensively revised and the conceptual changes have taken place in the writing system.Therefore,it is significant to comparing the writing system of the seventh edition of the textbooks between the old and new versions(the MEP edition and the PEP one).This topic is divided into four parts: The first part is the introduction,including the raise of the problem "the comparative research to writing system of two Chinese textbooks between the MEP edition and the PEP one",the research status of the subject,the research methods.The second part is theoretical basis,which are composed of compulsory education language curriculum standards and the relevant theoretical basis.The third part is the comparative research to writing system of two Chinese textbooks,which includes the writing purpose,writing knowledge,writing practice and language expression.Based on the findings,the fourth part are composed of the characteristics of the edition of Chinese textbook writing system and suggestions on textbooks using.The MEP edition is the inheritance and innovation of the PEP one.It's writing system has the following features: first,according the writing styles,the writing system has his own system.Second,To reconstruct the writingknowledge system and to penetrate the cultivation of the core literacy of the students.Third,the practice content of the writing system is close to the students' life,focusing on building a model of the dialogue between the textbook and the students.Fourth,the pursuit of diverse knowledge transfer means that the effectiveness of knowledge is greatly improved,mainly by procedural knowledge.On the basis of this,the paper puts forward some suggestions on how to use the teaching materials.First,teachers need to establish the global consciousness and students can grasp the writing goal as a whole,and then according to the sequence of the target on writing teaching step by step.Second,following the example of the textbook,paying attention to humanistic care,encouraging and guiding students from the emotional aspects,and to strengthen the guidance of writing practice and highlight the effectiveness of the guidance.Third,following the principle of writing teaching “reading and writing combining”,efficiently using “scoring sample” and “sample”,flexibly organizing the teaching of reading and writing,so that the students could truly master the knowledge and methods to improve writing skills.Although the writing system of the Chinese textbooks is successful,there are something to improvement.In the end,the author puts forward my own views on the shortcomings of the Chinese textbook writing system.There are two main points: one is the order of the partial arrangement of the writing to be adjusted;the second is to cultivate the students' ability to adapt to the actual needs.The writing system can be considered in accordance with the “expression + practical style” of this structure to arrange.The purpose of this paper is to enrich the comparative study of the writing system and the teaching system of the Chinese textbooks in the junior middle school,highlight the characteristics of the compilation textbook writing system,and promote the efficient use of writing materials and ensure the smoothly development of writing teaching.