Empirical Comparative Research And Satisfaction Evaluation Of Urban Residents' Fitness Leisure Space

With the rapid development of social economics,urban residents' fitness leisure demand have been growing since 1990s,construction of urban fitness recreation space has played an important role in local governments' work.Residents' satisfaction experience can directly affect the life quality,and then affect the development level of healthy city construction in this area.At present,the foreign scholars are expert in the study of urban fitness leisure space,who focuses on the satisfaction connotation,influences,evaluation system and model construction etc.The research on this field in our country started late,and we knew more about it from the logic inference.The research on the establishment of satisfaction evaluation system and the model building are few,lacking of total quantitative investigations and effective examples.From fitness residents' perspective,we try to build the urban fitness recreation space satisfaction evaluation system by applying literature research methods and principal component analysis.Nanjing,Fuzhou,Xiamen,including two types(popular and professional)inside of the fitness recreation space are empirically compared in this paper through using fuzzy comprehensive evaluation.Based on the analysis of the present situation of satisfaction,this paper puts forward some counter measures and suggestions to optimize the fitness leisure space,and provides reference for the future construction of urban fitness leisure space.Research conclusions are following:(1)Urban residents' fitness leisure space satisfaction evaluation system consists of six first-level indicators,40 secondary indexes.(2)From the evaluation results of satisfaction,Nanjing's satisfaction value is 4.032,which is the highest satisfaction level in three cities.Xiamen's satisfaction value is 3.991,which is close to the satisfactory level.Fuzhou's satisfaction value is 3.974,which is between the general and the satisfactory level.The index differences among the three cities are obvious in "service quality","environmental aesthetics" and "educational cognition" in primary specific metrics,which have great influences on the value of three cities' fitness recreation space satisfaction.(3)From different types of fitness recreation space,satisfaction of professional fitness recreation space is significantly higher than that of general type for residents.Professional fitness space satisfaction value is 4.099,in a satisfactory level,general fitness space satisfaction value is 3.927,which is between the general and the satisfactory level,close to satisfactory level.From primary index,in addition to the satisfaction evaluation of " environmental aesthetic" professional and public type are same,the other five indicators of professional satisfaction level are higher than the public fitness recreation space.The differences of four index are obvious in"service quality","physical and mental health","education cognition" and "individual value",indicating that these four indicators are main aspects which affect urban fitness recreation space satisfaction differences.