Research On The Role Change And Innovation Path Of Sub-district Office In Social Security Administration

Since the founding of the People's Republic of China,the Sub-district Office has undergone several role changes in social security governance.In different periods,it has played the role of "police controller","police manager" and "police manager".During the period of being a "police controller",the subdistrict office mainly achieved "social coherence" by unilaterally exporting the party's will to the public,so as to achieve the purpose of maintaining public order,but with relatively little interaction with the public Strong one-way and compulsory characteristics;during the period of "security administrator",the street office formed a management and managed relationship with the public,making the street office play a role in social security governance The characteristics of duality and interactivity are shown;in the period of “police administrators”,in order to respond to the needs of social security governance in the current and future periods,the social security governance work carried out by the subdistrict office should show “diversity” and “activeness” Sex ".According to the role change theory,at present,the main dilemma faced by street offices in social security governance is "the lack of vitality of street offices' public security governance caused by the lack of administrative resources" "the weakening of the connection between street offices and public security police stations during the process of institutionalization" and"Separation of the relationship between the street office and the public" and so on.Q Subdistrict Office has carried out a series of attempts to explore the above difficulties.First of all,in view of the problems of low financial allocation rights and poor security governance mechanisms caused by the lack of administrative resources,Q Street tried to start from revitalizing administrative resources,by exploring a guarantee property management model,building a "property alliance" management platform,and reshaping the network.In order to solve the problems of the destruction of the original interaction mode between the street office and the public security police station and the simple and extensive mode of theexisting connection,Q Street emphasizes the importance of training Common emotions promote and guide the two benign interactions.To this end,on the one hand,Q Street and the J police station in the jurisdiction have initiated a number of preferential police treatment measures to directly improve the sense of belonging and satisfaction of the police.On the other hand,through Provide high-quality police services and build a"multiple linkage" mediation mechanism to reduce the pressure on the police station,and indirectly enhance the sense of professional honor and accomplishment of the police;finally,facing the people's "unfamiliar" "distrust" "resistance" The committee's insufficient connection between the street office and the people and the problem of the alienation of the relationship between the street office and the public caused by the low ability to respond to emergencies.Q street promotes "emotional governance" and attracts the"village elite" depth Participate in difficult work disposal,use "risk assessment" to improve the level of prevention and control of public security risks,and use "system construction"to shape the image of the street office's legal governance to narrow the distance between the street office and the public and bridge the relationship between the two.