| At present,the two committees of the community play an irreplaceable role in community governance.However,as community governance policies continue to develop and innovate,and community governance subjects become more diverse,community enablers play an increasingly important role in community development..As the intrinsic resources of the community itself,we must give full play to its advantages before we can further develop community governance.However,how to make better use of its advantages in a complex social environment to make a difference? What are the current capabilities of community enablers and how to develop or enhance their abilities? In response to this situation,this paper proposes to raise the leadership of the community.This paper selects the community capable people in the C city Q community as the research object,and adopts the research method combining the questionnaire method and the interview method to understand and analyze the generation mechanism of the community capable person,the personal characteristics of the community capable person,the dilemma faced,etc.Analyze.Based on the five-force model of leadership and the theory of group dynamics,this paper explores the status of community-leading leadership from five aspects: the charisma,foresight,influence,decision-making power and control of the community.Through the needs analysis,the group activity plan is designed for the problems of the Q community.Through the analysis of the group dynamics and dynamic process of the group work activity preparation period,the group activity early stage,the group activity medium stage and the group activity stage,the team’s motivation is promoted to promote the group’s goal.After 7 group activities,the evaluation showed that the leadership of the Q community can be greatly improved.Specifically,in terms of appeal,the average score before the team started was 3.04,and the score after the group ended was 3.8.The mood and behavior of the team members were relieved and improved to varying degrees,and there was a certain improvement in self-confidence..In terms of forward-looking,the average score before the team was 2.64,and the score after the team was 3.2.The team members had a clearer understanding of the team’s goals and the ability to improve the team’s planning and development..In terms of influence,the average score before the team started was 3.08,and the score after the group ended was 3.6.The communication mode of the team members changed to a certain extent,and the team members could better communicate and communicate effectively,but also There are situations where there is little change in capacity.In terms of determination,the average score before the team’s development was 3.16,and the score after the group was 3.56.The team members’ change was relatively small,but the planning ability was also improved.In terms of control,the average score before the team was 3.24,and the score after the group was 3.56.The degree of control improvement was small.This is where the group workers need to reflect on the design of the event.Therefore,under the guidance of group dynamics,group social work is operational in improving the leadership of the community and can promote the development of community governance. |
