A Comparative Study Of The 2016 Edition Of Ministy Of Education And The 2001 Edition Of Beijing Normal University Of The History Textbook Of Junior Middle School

Since the autumn of 2016,the Ministry edited junior high school history textbooks have been put into use one after another.The textbook edited by the Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China was compiled by the Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China.After ten years,the compulsory history textbook of junior middle school,edited by Professor Qi Shirong,a well-known historian,was finally published.The history of the seventh grade was first put into use,which aroused great repercussions in the history teaching of secondary schools.This paper attempts to explore the characteristics of the textbook edited by the whole department from a smaller angle,so as to guide the teaching practice.Guided by the Compulsory Education History Curriculum Standard(2011edition),this paper compares the "social change" part of the second unit of the seventh grade first volume of the textbook edited by the Ministry and edited by the Peking Normal University,compares the title,introduction,text and exercises of the second unit,and analyses the specific content of the text,and on the basis of comparative analysis,compares the two parts.In the process of editing textbooks in the use department,some suggestions are put forward on how to make full use of the strengths and avoid the weaknesses.In the introduction part,this paper describes the reason and significance of the topic selection,and the general situation of comparative research on textbooks in China.It mainly includes three parts: the comparison of different versions of junior middle school history textbooks,the comparison of the same version of junior middle school history textbooks in different periods,and the comparison of junior middle school history textbooks in different countries.The text is divided into three parts: In the first chapter,we compare the content of the unit between two versions of textbooks,including the title of each lesson,the introduction of the unit,the introduction of each lesson,the text system,the exercises after class,and the interpretation of the "curriculum standard" in the two versions of textbooks.Through comparison,we can see that the edition of the unit has made great progress and improvement compared with the edition of Peking Normal University.This is the case.In the second chapter,through the analysis and comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of the two versions of textbooks,the common advantages and disadvantages of the two versions of textbooks,as well as the advantages and disadvantages of the two versions of textbooks,summarize the characteristics of the two versions of textbooks.The third chapter is based on the above analysis,combined with the experience of using the edited textbooks by the Department itself,and puts forward some suggestions on how to better use the edited textbooks by the Department in the future teaching.