Font Size: a A A

Analysis Of The Difference Between Self-weight Training And Equipment Training For College Students' Bodybuilding Effects

Posted on:2019-06-24Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:Z X WuFull Text:PDF
GTID:2437330545473569Subject:Physical Education and Training
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Objective: To explore the reasons for the popularity of the heavy training in recent years,to demonstrate the difference between the self weight training and the equipment training on the body building effect(good and bad points and different points),and to put forward some suggestions on the application of self weight training to the course of fitness and Bodybuilding in Colleges and universities.Methods: the methods of literature,questionnaire survey and interview,mathematical statistics,test and logical analysis were adopted.Based on the theory of fitness and fitness,combined with the modern physical training theory,two classes of 2015 class leisure sports department of our school were selected,an experimental class(self-weight training)and a control class(instrument training).The difference between self weight training and equipment training for bodybuilding effect was studied.Results: the index of circumference growth.The more obvious changes(p<0.05): the increase in shoulder width,the control class is better than the experimental class,the increase in the chest circumference,the control class is better than the experimental class,the growth of the arm circumference,the experimental class is better than the control class.The "different" comparison between the experimental class and the control class: the self-weight training is better for the biceps,triceps and back muscles of the arm,and the training for the chest and shoulder is better than the self weight training for the training of the chest and shoulder.The index of muscle strength growth.Several more obvious changes(p<0.05): the growth of horizontal push muscle strength,the experimental class is better than the control class;the growth of the hard pull aspect,the experimental class is superior to the control class;the increase of the number of the introduction,the experimental class is superior to the control class,the increase of the squat muscle strength and the control class is superior to the experimental class.The "different" comparison between the experimental class and the control class: the self-weight training is better for the muscle strength and the whole body explosive force,and the training of the instrument training for the leg and hip muscle strength is obviously better than the self weight training.An indicator of body shape.The changes of the shoulder to waist ratio,the change of the shoulder to waist ratio,the experimental class and the control class were almost identical,the change of the body fat,the experimental class was better than the control class,the change of the MBI,the control class was greater than the experimental class,the change of the chest and waist and the control class was better than the experimental class.The "different" comparison between the experimental class and the control class: self weight training was better in shaping the weight loss,the proportion of the body and the lines,and the increase in BMI,lean body weight,physical fulfilling and muscle fullness were better than the self-weight training.Suggestion:1.In the teaching of fitness and fitness training in Colleges and universities,it is suggested that the more use of the narrow-distance backhand to stimulate and develop the biceps,and to use the double bars arm to stimulate and develop the triceps.For students who are too fat or heavier,they use peer support to perform their actions;for students who are too thin or can easily complete the exercise,they use action steps to limit the number of actions.2.Self weight training should be applied to the teaching of body building in Colleges and Universities: the track of self weight training is not fixed,the weight of training is not easy to adjust to the instrument,and the students' action is not easy to find the feeling of training;the teacher or coach should emphasize the movement track and square of the action in the teaching,guide the students to complete the standard action and let the students learn.Students find the sense of training and the strength part of muscles.Through the four stage of sports skill maturity,generalization,differentiation,consolidation and improvement,the sports skills in the short term will be greatly improved.3.Self weight training in college bodybuilding teaching is more suitable to exercise coordination and full body explosive force;at the same time,more muscle tension and relaxation are added to reduce muscle adhesion,increase muscle elasticity and coordination,and avoid the accumulation of "dead muscles" and lactic acid.4.It is suggested that the self-weight training should be used to relieve the pressure of insufficient equipment,increase the diversity and entertainment of the course organization when the equipment is insufficient,the field is limited and the students are too inconvenient to manage,and it also increases the diversity and amusement of the course organization,and uses the self weight training to complete the movements together,to increase the synchronicity of the completion of the movement,and to correct the error correction.5,in College Aerobics Teaching,self weight training can be used as the after-school exercise to experience muscle strength and training feeling.At the same time,self weight training can be used as a good way for aerobic and fat reduction.Most of the most popular methods of "high intensity intermittent training" are self weight training at present.
Keywords/Search Tags:Self weight training, college students, bodybuilding effect, difference
PDF Full Text Request
Related items