Campaign-Style Governance Research On Dilemma And Optimization

Due to the acceleration of social transformation,the diverse needs of the masses,prominent social contradictions and rising governance costs,the demand for reasonable social governance has become urgent,even if we enter the ranks of middle-income countries.The choice of various social governance tools has gradually become the focus of research and debate.“Campaign-style” governance,a kind of social governance tools commonly used by the government at all levels,has attracted much attention because of its rapid,strong and effective governance effect,but it has also been criticized for violating the legal system,strong means and unsustainable effects.Therefore,It is a topic worthy of deep thought regarding how can local governments make full use of the double-edged sword of Campaign-style” governance,while dealing with local governance problems and avoid unnecessary interference to the masses.The prominent problems of expressway,for instance,low traffic efficiency,high transportation cost,poor consumption experience,etc.,have severely adverse effect on the society,economy,people’s livelihood and ecology.The popularization of ETC plays a significant role in improving the current highway "difficult situation",which is a good policy beneficial for the nation and people.However,in the actual promotion process,there have been negative events such as large-scale administrative apportionment,forced installation and vicious competition,resulting in a very strong wave of public opinion.In this case,we have conducted field visits & comprehensive observation,and in-depth interviews with ETC salesmen,ETC users from different dimensions and relevant stakeholders,so as to fully understand the reasons and original intention of the “Campaign-style” popularization of ETC,the methods and effects,the chaos and public opinion storm,as well as the corresponding emergency measures.In the context of “Campaign-style”governance,it is a very realistic and far-reaching subject regarding how to overcome the ubiquitous problems such as rigid leadership thinking,insufficient awareness of people’s livelihood,prevailing bureaucracy,and formalism,and avoid the phenomena such as excessively high goal,urgent manner,fast process,overexertion,etc.,so as to truly implement the “landing” of the good policy and general acceptance by the broad masses.Starting with the theoretical concept,this paper introduces the basic definition,origin,development and various characteristics of“Campaign-style” governance,so as to lay a theoretical foundation for the next in-depth analysis and research.Secondly,with the help of ETC comprehensive promotion cases starting in 2019,the practical role and contradictions of “Campaign-style” governance are put forward from the description and analysis of case events by means of whole process tracking and tracing,visit and investigation,so as to lead to the core goal of the research,that is,the core problem of sports governance.Thirdly,through the research on the problems in the process of “Campaign-style”governance,it is found that there are many core problems such as policy distortion,policy arbitrariness,policy show and so on.After in-depth analysis of the core problems,there can be several reasons: the imbalance of supervision and incentive mechanism,the weak legal thinking of leading cadres,and the lack of ruling ability of local leading cadres.Finally,according to the causes of the core problems,this paper puts forward some transformative suggestions to adapt to the current social governance,such as further strengthening and improving the government supervision and incentive mechanism,paying attention to the cultivation of legal thinking,and enhancing the construction of ruling ability.