Research On The Governance Efficiency Transformation Of Village Regulations And Folk Rules

With the deepening of the modernization of China’s national governance system and governance capacity,village regulations and folk rules have increasingly become an important part of promoting the modernization of grass-roots social governance system and governance capacity.In 2018,the "Guidelines on the work of village regulations and folk rules and residents’ conventions" became the first guidance document for village regulations and residents’ conventions in China,which was jointly promulgated by the Ministry of Civil Affairs and other seven departments.According to the requirements of this document,by2020,all administrative villages in Guangxi must be formulated the village regulations and folk rules.The Fifth Plenary Session of the 19 th CPC Central Committee clearly put forward the goal of improving the efficiency of state governance in 2035.As an important form to promote the integration of grassroots social autonomy,rule of law and rule of virtue,village regulations and folk rules are an significant form in grass-roots social governance system.From the perspective of the institutional nature of village regulations and folk rules,this paper analyzes that village regulations and folk rules should possess the governance efficiency of leading,integrating and binding forces.Meanwhile,based on the hypothesis of human behavior in the theory of neo-institutional economics,this paper explores three conditional mechanisms that should be possessed by the governance efficiency transformation of village regulations and folk rules.The first one is the adequate consultation mechanism,explores the preconditions for realizing the governance efficiency transformation of village regulations and folk rules in the view of the "Economic Man" Hypothesis.The second is the educational enculturation mechanism,which explains the important role of this mechanism in promoting the governance efficiency transformation of village regulations and folk rules from the perspective of human bounded rationality.The third is that improve the reward and punishment mechanism and explain the mechanism construction of the governance efficiency transformation of village regulations and folk rules from the perspective of maximizing interests under constraints.Recording to the case analysis of the construction of the village regulations and folk rules in G village of B county and D village of X county,the initially constructed village regulations and folk rules are more manifested as a written "wall system",which is only "built" but not fully "moved","used" and "alive".It is found that village regulations and folk rules,as a system,is still a long way to go in exerting the governance efficiency such as leading force,binding force and integration force,and it’s institutional strengths has not been fully transformed into governance efficiency.In order to better analyze the reasons for the insufficient transformation of the governance efficiency of village regulations and folk rules,this paper makes a comparative analysis of the similarities and differences between G village,D village and village regulations and folk rules in Jinxiu Yao Autonomous County,by means of case comparison,and that it is found that insufficient consultation at the stage of construction of village regulations and folk rules,inadequate education in the implementation process and imperfect rewards and punishments in the control process are the reasons that restrict the full transformation of the governance efficiency of village regulations and folk rules.Therefore,at next stage of the construction of village regulations and folk rules,we should mobilize the enthusiasm,initiative,participation and consciousness of multiple subjects from the aspects of strengthening the educational enculturation,perfecting the adequate consultation mechanism and perfecting the reward and punishment mechanism,so as to promote the transformation of the governance efficiency of the village regulations and folk rules and turn it into a substantive operation order to promote the effectiveness of grassroots governance and the new improvement of governance efficiency.