| Times have changed,but the pursuit of promoting the overall high-quality development of basic education has not changed,because it has a leading and strategic impact on the high-quality development of the entire education system.This requires that in terms of training objectives,the core literacy orientation should be highlighted,including critical thinking,independent development ability,communication and cooperation ability,civic literacy,information literacy,etc.In the way of education,we should improve the teaching method,optimize the curriculum structure and constantly improve the overall quality of education.It is a positive response to the pursuit of high-quality development of basic education to take the lead in conducting debate activities leading students to improve their thinking and innovative qualities in primary and secondary schools.It is also an effective way of teaching activities that can really arouse thinking and stimulate innovation potential.Primary school is the starting point of nine-year compulsory education.The rise of primary school debate means that it opens a convenient enlightenment path for primary school students to think creatively from the source.However,the development of primary school debate activities encountered difficulties,which hindered the in-depth promotion of debate activities and the all-round improvement of students’ thinking ability.It is necessary to explore new ways to improve.Based on the cognitive law of diversity,difference and initiative of individual cognitive development,this study adopts the research logic of finding problems,analyzing problems and improving problems,and selects the primary school debate activity of Chongqing Xie Jiawan School as the research object to present the practical dilemma of primary school debate activity at the present stage.The paper also analyzes the causes of the practical dilemma of the case school and tries to put forward the improvement path from the perspective of school-based curriculum construction and implementation.The improvement effect is presented through the lesson examples,so as to truly solve the problem that the multiple intelligence and logical speculative intelligence of primary school students have not found an effective debate teaching method to stimulate,and explore the general law of the in-depth development of primary school debate activities from the case.Firstly,through the common analysis of Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligences and Piaget’s theory of cognitive development,it is found that they both pay attention to the cognitive characteristics of children’s cognitive development,such as diversity,stage and autonomy,which have important theoretical guiding significance for the in-depth practice of primary school debate activities.Secondly,on the basis of objective research,the paper presents the practice of primary school debate activities in Chongqing Xie Jiawan School,and finds that there are some practical difficulties in the case school,such as the difficulty in taking into account the learning stage difference of debate,the lack of clarity in the way of speculative progress,and the lack of balance between competition and cooperation in debate.Then,the attribution analysis is carried out according to the rules of children’s cognitive development.Finally,from the perspective of curriculum development and implementation,the following improvement paths are proposed: reconstruct the systematic curriculum goal system that fits the characteristics of students’ years,refine the step-by-step speculative advanced practice plan,activate students’ sense of self-efficacy with the way of "full debater",and practice the refined teaching paradigm of debate activities.And three debate practical lessons of low,middle and high grades in primary school showed improvement results.Through the case study of the practical difficulties and improvement paths of primary school debate activities in Chongqing Xie Jiawan School,it is expected to explore a practical path of primary school debate activities that can truly activate students’ speculative potential and conform to the rules of cognitive discovery of students of different age,so as to lay the foundation for the enlightenment and deepen the connection for middle school and university debate activities.It lays a long-term foundation for students’ thinking life and lifelong education. |