| The National《Educational Planning Outline》 pointed out that it is the common responsibility of the whole society to reduce the student’s schoolwork burden,and it is necessary to "adjust the content of the course and design the difficulty of the course scientifically." According to this spirit,the 《Standard(2011 Edition)》 adjusted the course content from four aspects to reduce the schoolwork burden of students.However,there are still some varying degrees of phenomena which of elevating the teaching requirements in the physics teaching of junior high schools in various places.The research object of this topic is the Scientific investigation examination paper of senior high school entrance examination in Xinjiang Autonomous Region from 2012 to 2021.By sorting out the unified examination papers of the senior high school entrance examination in recent ten years in the autonomous region,combined with the physics course standards(2011 version),in order to research the overall situation of the Scientific investigation examination paper.With the research of scientific elements investigation of these examination papers by adopting the SEC analysis mode and calculating the consistency of P value,and with the research of the consistency of the content themes between the Scientific investigation examination paper of the senior high school entrance examination and the course standards in recent years to analyze the reasons for the deviation of consistency.Through the conclusions drawn,the topic can feedback suggestions to front-line educators and other educational workers in order to provide reference for actual teaching and improve the efficiency of education and teaching.The conclusion of the thesis can also improve the reference for the proposition of the examination paper,so that the examination paper can be closer to the course standard and achieve the purpose of reducing the student’s schoolwork burden.Conclusions as below:1.The scientific investigation questions are mainly reflected in the experimental investigation questions of the Scientific investigation examination paper.There were 4 major questions in the experimental investigation from 2012 to 2018,and the total score of it increased year by year but the score was uncertain 。 In 2019,the Urumqi paper and the unified examination paper were combined,and the experimental investigation questions were fixed to three questions,with a unified score of 24 points.2.Among the seven elements,"designing experiments and making plans","carrying out experiments and collecting the data","analyzing and demonstrating" have the highest proportions.but there have no question about "Posing questions"."Posing questions","guess and assumptions","expression and communication" are all too subjective or require too much thinking ability of students,and it is difficult to apply them to examination questions."Analysis and demonstration" are mainly about two points: experimental calculation and conclusion analysis,which account for the largest proportion of the entire scientific investigation examination questions.3.The average value calculated by the p-value among the ten-year scientific examination papers is 0.5036,the consistency is poor.Through further analysis of the 13 secondary objectives,it is found that the examination situation of each year is different,and there is no corresponding relationship like the course standards.The main reason is that due to the limitation of the types of scientific investigation questions,many objectives cannot be examined in the examination papers of the senior high school entrance examination.From the dimension of content and theme,the distribution of each year is quite different from the distribution of course standards.The proportion of the examination about "energy" theme is in good agreement with the course standards,and the proportion of the examination about "sports and interaction" theme is generally on the high side.The proportion of the examination about "substance" theme is relatively low.From the dimension of cognitive level.The overall examination paper examines too much about "operation" and "experience" of cognitive level,and too little about "understanding" of cognitive level. |