Study On The Influencing Of Livelihood Capital Of Poverty-stricken Househo.lds On Sustainable Livelihood Level

Poverty alleviation and development has always been a focus of China’s attention.By November 23,2020,832 state-level poor counties in The province had been lifted out of poverty.By the end of September2021,nearly 5 million poor people had been monitored by the state,and24 percent of those lifted out of poverty were still at risk of falling back into poverty.In 2021,Fujian province issued the Implementation Opinions on Effectively Linking Consolidated and Expanded Poverty Alleviation Achievements with Rural Revitalization,and proposed to improve the rapid detection and response mechanism of those vulnerable to poverty and returning to poverty,so as to make solid progress in the transition work and consolidate poverty alleviation achievements.Fujian province has adopted a series of dynamic monitoring and assistance measures for unstable families,marginal families prone to poverty,and sudden and severe poor families,which has achieved certain effects in consolidating poverty alleviation.But poverty reduction results of unsustainable Chinese risk can not be ignored,such as how to achieve long-term poverty alleviation of poverty families in fujian province and marginal population timely help,truly poverty will never be Chinese,solve the problem of sustainable livelihoods of their poverty to pick a hat,effective connection to the province to further improve the follow-up support policy,rural revitalization,in "the poverty alleviation era" is especially important.Based on the above research background,this paper reviews existing studies and relevant theories,and uses questionnaire survey to investigate the livelihood capital and sustainable livelihood status of poverty-stricken households in several counties of Fujian Province.SPSS 21.0 software was used to analyze the status quo of the sustainable living level of the poverty-relief households.It was found that the income of the povertyrelief households was relatively stable,their self-worth and political rights were greatly improved,and their employability and life satisfaction were signifhcantly improved.Only a few poverty-relief households had the risk of returning to poverty.And the multiple stepwise regression method was used to explore the relationship between the two.The following independent variables were found to be significant: "the situation of getting along with the village committee and government staff;If you get stuck,be willing to think of lots of ways to get out of it.Difficulty in getting help when in trouble;Types of large electrical appliances in the home;Only hard work can bring a good life;The type of social security that family members participate in or enjoy;The ease of transportation around the family residence."Finally,it is concluded that material conditions,social relations,social insurance and psychological capital all affect the sustainable livelihood level of the households out of poverty,and the households with better material conditions,social relations,more social insurance and more resilient psychological capital have a relatively higher sustainable livelihood level.Combined with the actual situation and survey data in the interview,the sustainable livelihood of the poverty-stricken households should be guided to form the concept of active poverty alleviation,and efforts should be made to develop education and training;Improve all kinds of infrastructure construction to attract "production" and "people" to poverty-stricken areas;Continue to follow up the material security of poverty-stricken households,and continuously strengthen medical security;Gradually adjust the measures to help the poverty-stricken households,do a good job in the transition before the policy withdrawal,fully mobilize the initiative of the poverty-stricken households,change the passive "blood transfusion" to the active "hematopoiesis",and permanently out of poverty.