In The Civil Service Examination System A Comparative Study

As is well-known, civil servant assessment is a worldwide difficult problem. Though many efforts have been made to pursue a fair, just and objective assessment of civil servant, there is no common scientific method so far. Civil servant assessment is an important issue in the politic system reformation of our country, a necessary demand of the development of socialism market economy system and a historical task faced by the harmonious development of social politics and economy. Civil servant assessment is an important part of the civil servant constitution of our country and of our country's reformation of personnel management, therefore studies on the civil servant constitution are of critical historical and realistic significance. As for the shared current problems, every country should enhance exchange and cooperation of the research findings and practical experiences on the constitution of civil servant assessment.We should place more emphases on exchanging with and learning from Japan about the constitution of civil servant including civil servant assessment, when we try to introduce advanced assessment theories and methods from western countries. Our country had sent ministers to make an extensive investigation and study on Japanese civil servantconstitution. After PRC founded, our country had cooperated with Japan in many related issues and performed many profound close exchanges, when establishing civil servant constitution in the 1990s. As oriental countries, our country have many similar aspects with Japan. First, both have an environment featured by similar oriental traditional culture. Second, Japan had also experienced a developmental course to combine western civil servant constitution with native surroundings. Third, our country is undertaking a fast economic development now just as Japan had done after World War Two. In addition, as is well-known cross the world, the consummation of Japanese civil servant constitution is a indispensable factor of its booming economic development. I hope to take civil servant assessment constitution as a perspective in order to strengthen academic exchanges and communication about civil servant constitution between two countries, to promote more understanding between Chinese government and Japanese government, to impel improvement and development of the relationship between two countries. So, it is of profound significance to make a comparative study on Chinese and Japanese civil servant assessment constitution.This dissertation has referred to and etc and a lot of books written in Japanese and original data. Philological analysis method and comparative study method are employed to explore the causes and concrete means of the success of Japanese civil servant constitution by comparing Chinese and Japanese civil servant assessment constitution from the perspective of civil servant assessment constitution. A new point is put forward taking value orientation and motivation as core and reinforcing culture construction as direction and taking a series of concrete measures to improve the system of our country's civil servant assessment constitution.The dissertation is composed of seven chapters and can be divided into three parts. The first part is the first chapter, that is comparison between Chinese and Japanese civil servant constitution. I point out the excellence and difference in law, constitution and the assessment system of Japanese civil servant constitution characterized as an advanced type over Chinese civil servant constitution characterized as a developing type. The second part is the main body composed of the second, the third, the fourth and the fifth chapter. It has made a comprehensive comparative study on Chinese and Japanese civil servant assessment constitution. The second chapter deals with the comparison of the principles and value orientation between Chinese and Japanese civil servant assessment and comes to a conclusion that the difference of ideas and instructions is the inner reasonfor the difference between Chinese and Japanese civil servant assessment constitution. The third chapter is comparison of the content and the system of standard between Chinese and Japanese civil servant assessment constitution. By comparing virtue, competence, diligence, performance, cleanness in Chinese civil servant assessment constitution with performance, capability, personality and adaptability in Japanese civil servant assessment constitution, the problems in the setting of target system and result of Chinese civil servant assessment constitution are revealed. In the fourth and fifth chapters, the running mechanisms of civil servant assessment are analyzed and compared concretely in assessment subject, assessment procedure, assessment methods and assessment effect. I point out that constructions of legal system, constitution and specialization should be strengthened in Chinese civil servant assessment subject and that attention should be paid on regulating and intensifying routine assessment in assessment procedure and at the same time reveal the disadvantages of Japanese civil assessment subject's lacking training and assessment procedure not being public; I conclude the differences between the two countries' assessment methods and show the superiority of combining assessment effect with training and salary in Japanese civil servant assessment. The third part is the conclusion composed of the sixth chapter and the seventh chapter. By comparing status quo and development tendency of Chinese civil servant assessment constitutionwith those of Japan, I expound the existing problems and the tendency and the keys of reformation in the future. As for the enlightenment to the construction of Chinese civil servant assessment constitution, I try to provide consultative suggestions and applicable plans for the modeling and running mode of Chinese civil servant assessment constitution from culture construction, constitution improvement and operation that are key points of improving civil servant assessment constitution.