Contemporary Chinese Social Organizations To Participate In The Accountability

"SARS" to accountability storm swept through China in 2003. "Accountability" is only really as a clear system to enter people's vision. Accountability as our democracy is an important part ,also is an important way to build a responsible government, rule of law government, democratic government. This system not only helps prevent the alienation of the executive power system in the country's political system, but also helps prevent bureaucratic government functions, improve administrative efficiency and will help bind the Government and officials truly accountable to the people. Improve and perfect the accountability system, we must first implement the accountability of the main. That is, who initiated and implemented the government and officials of the institutions and mechanisms of accountability. Accountability can be divided into consubstantial accountability and allo accountability. China's current administrative accountability system is the consubstantial accountability, the accountability of the main theoretical studies have focused on consubstantial accountability with the body, that is, from within the specific political parties or government departments of the system itself to monitor the actions and accountability. For the allo accountability , also is the external accountability to the government and its officials, regardless of the number of studies or research degree is less than the former. As a variant of accountability for one of the main social groups are more infrequent. With comparison of consubstantial accountability and allo accountability, allo accountability can be found on the power held in the depth and breadth more advantages. Accountability not only rely on the power system from the internal accountability of the same body, especially the full attention and active promotion of other public sector bodies to participate in civic and social accountability, which is help to form the democratic accountability of the atmosphere. Community groups to participate in the basic elements of accountability make up the government mainly through management of the blank, representing the interests of all sectors of the population to participate in the development and implementation of government policies and accountability missing. Level government officials in several aspects of the responsibility achieve democratic accountability. As the ratio of civil society groups operating in the political process of the individual exerts influence more effectively, so community groups involved in the theory and practice of accountability in the accountability system in China has far-reaching significance. Since reform and opening, China's social organizations have grown up with the market economy and the rapid rise of democratic development, and have increasingly significant impact on Chinese economic, political and social lives. As China's political system reform, government increases the attention to the legal system and a substantial decentralization of government, the social organizations also more actively participate in the political development of the channel. Accountability of community groups involve in the initial conditions with the subjective and objective conditions. But the social organizations give full play to the role of accountability, there are still some obstacles. Mainly existing in the social groups rely on their own, weak and disorder problems, lack of awareness of rights group members ,Community groups participate in the way of accountability lack of standardized, institutionalized and low level of the problem.If Chinese social organizations want to take a leading role in the accountability system, there are two aspects of the development path. First, the Government should create the ideal environment accountable for the social groups, Government decentralization to community groups, social groups to participate in the accountability for the provision of legal and institutional guarantees. Second, the social organizations should improve the performance and capacity of participating in accountability, strengthen awareness of their rights, improve their professional competence and credibility of organizational strength, and full use of all means of accountability.