| The teaching content is the core of Chinese teaching and also the breakthrough of teaching reform.With the development of curriculum reform,what we should be taught increasingly attract researchers’ attention.The content of the curriculum directly affect teaching efficiency.The basis of curriculum determined by Chinese teacher is worthy of discussion.This paper mainly applies the method of text analysis and interview to analyze the teaching design of 80 high school Chinese teachers with the foundation of Zhu Xiaomin’s revised Chinese teaching content analysis framework,and summarizes teaching contents.Then,by interviewing with the teachers on these contents,the researcher understands to understand the basis of teacher’s determination,and further explores the basis of curriculum content’s status quo.The study found:In terms of content,on the whole,senior high school’s Chinese curriculum content is comprehensive,but they are not balanced.Specifically,in the language knowledge teaching,teachers attach importance to language rules,text content and speech behaviors,but ignore speech experience;In terms of skills training,teachers attach importance to the training of speech,but the skills of acquisition is relatively inadequate;In the cultivation of cultural quality,teachers attach importance to the literary common sense and moral performance,but the scientific knowledge and aesthetic interest is adequate.In terms of content basis,on the whole,senior high school teachers mainly decide teaching content based on curriculum standards,textbooks,teaching books,exam questions.However,there exist some problems: according to standard,it is difficult to decide specific proposals in the curriculum;according to textbook,it is easy to ignore the text itself;according to teaching book,there is a certain blindness.Based on above research findings,the paper will discuss the basis of content determined by teachers and offer suggestions from teaching standard,textbook,teaching books,examination questions and students’ learning situation’s points of view. |