| Force to carry out the high school geography practice assessment is the important way to promote the development of students' geography practice ability,helps to develop the talent of high school geography practical evaluation index system for research,is not only the inevitable requirement of the current education reform,and improve the system of selecting talents of the need to establish evaluation index system of high school geography practice force,not only pay attention to the development of students' ability in the implementation of the new standard to cultivate students core geographic literacy requirement,also enriches the theoretical research of our country's geography practical evaluation.Geography practical evaluation is based on the geographical practice activities,using the evaluation questionnaire,combining the process evaluation and result evaluation,combined with a file cover assessment,performance assessment,the students' self evaluation,group evaluation and combination of teacher evaluation,to the student in geographical investigation,survey and experiment process performance and results of the three geographic practice is rated,and the evaluation of the evaluation.So to build a set of operable and level to fit the development of high school geography practical evaluation index system,the purpose is to students in the teaching and evaluation through evaluation of geographical practice as force level,cause the reflection of teachers and students,and draw lessons from the evaluation results,promote targeted teaching for teachers and students have focused on study.In order to deepen the students' understanding of the practical ability of geography,guarantee and implement the development of the practical ability of geography in senior high school students,and make the core quality of Chinese students take root.At present,the domestic research on the evaluation of geographic practical ability mostly focuses on the interpretation of its connotation and cultivation,but there are few studies on the evaluation of geographic practical ability,and there is no systematic evaluation index system.Through to the domestic and foreign existing geography practice ability evaluation and other such as physics,chemistry experimental ability evaluation,the overall quality appraisal,evaluation of comprehensive practical activity,physical educationcurriculum evaluation,inquiry learning evaluation and other aspects of the literature and case analysis,geographic practice force can be divided into geographical,geological survey and three geographic experiment ability,as a geographical practice force evaluation indicators.According to bloom education target classification in motor skills in the field of classification and process of three kinds of practice activities,respectively,will examine the geographical,geological survey and experiment ability index of the three class from students perception level to level,make incremental design,the design of the ability to "collect data","ability to apply the geographic tools","diagramming ability" and "self-reflection" 36 secondary indicators.According to the new standard on the level and the basic elements of geographic practice force analysis(PTA)evaluation theory,the hierarchy on the secondary indexes,the elaboration as operable tertiary index,reflect students to geography practice ability and level,thus the experimental ability of geographic refinements as article 31 the three-level index,geographical investigation ability elaboration article 35 tertiary indicators,geographical investigation ability is divided into 34 tertiary indicators.At this point,the preliminary draft of the evaluation index system of geographic practical ability evaluation is completed.It remains to be further studied whether the evaluation index of high school students' practical ability in geography is suitable for the development characteristics of high school students in China and the characteristics of geography.This paper adopts the method of expert consultation to investigate the indexes of practical ability of geography in senior high school students,and grades and analyzes the appropriateness of the 100 indexes.The collected survey data were statistically analyzed using SPSS20.0,and the reliability of evaluation indicators,the consistency of respondents' opinions,the concentration of different respondents' opinions,and the appropriateness of specific indicators were analyzed.Combined with the result of expert consultation and geographical discipline characteristic,through to the experience of middle school geography teacher consult a line,the average score in the following 4 have 31 unqualified index are analyzed and modified,find out the problems on the one hand is unqualified index there was a problem with the logical relationship between specific indicators,on the other hand is a specific statement of the problem.Finally,the evaluation index system of high school students' geographic practical ability is determined as the evaluation index system of geographic experimental ability,which includes 11 secondary indicators and 32 tertiary indicators,12 secondary indicators and 34 tertiary indicators,12 secondary indicators and 34 tertiary indicators,and 13 secondary indicators and 33 tertiary indicators. |