Criticism Of Chinese Communist Party On Agriculture Socialism

The purpose of studying history is for the future. The history of the new democratic revolution has proved that during the process of the revolution, if we can't lead the large farmer to make the resolute conflict against the feudalism landlord, change the feudalism landlord's land property into the farmer's, and make the large farmer acquire ameliorative foundation, otherwise, it is impossible to produce the term to obtain power headspring. The same as above, if we can't firmly stick to the policy to unite the whole, it injures not only the benefits of the medial and small propertied, but also the benefits of crowd labor with the new benefits of democratic nation. However, cognition about these two basic characteristics of china's revolution is not forming the same opinion in the whole party. For a long time, the economic consciousness deeply rooted in small agriculture constantly interfered is socialism of necessity trend. The agriculture socialism is a mistaken current of thought of the serious breakage function against development to Chinese revolutions. Therefore, Chinese communist party, led by Mao Zedong, criticized agriculture socialism, overcame the tendency of the "left" in the party, firmly stacked to the socialist revolution prospect, and probed the right path of the developments to realize socialism.The thesis consists of three parts.The first part primarily illustrates the analysing for the history origin about agriculture socialism, namely, small agriculture combined with cottage industry is occupying the main position in the whole social economy over a long period of time. This text on these grounds points out the socialism of a cloud-castle agriculture thought from the peace Kingdom of Heavens with the doctrine thought is a social history soil to produce agriculture socialism. The second part is the party put judgment on agriculture socialism in different historic periods. Here the conclusion based on grounds the above is that socialism must be established on the foundation of the big production, otherwise it can be a mirage. The third part is a conclusion...